On Thursday, 19 July 2018 10:50:20 AM AEST Ian Jackson wrote:
> I think this naming, and the iconography, is all very unfortunate.
> IMO it is not compatible with Debian's Diversity Statement (which as
> ou know was ratified by an overwhelming majority of DDs).
You are overreacting. Name of the pa
Hello,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 05:40:46PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Here is an example: I'm aware of legal human name that is offensive and
> inappropriate in another language. Nobody in the right mind would use
that might be possible, but it is not a appropriate comparison in this
case:
-T
Hi Dmitry,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 05:40:46PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Thursday, 19 July 2018 10:50:20 AM AEST Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I think this naming, and the iconography, is all very unfortunate.
> > IMO it is not compatible with Debian's Diversity Statement (which as
> > ou know was
Hi Sebastian,
El mié, 18-07-2018 a las 21:41 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
escribió:
> On 2018-02-27 18:34:13 [+0100], Héctor Romojaro Gómez wrote:
> > El mar, 27-02-2018 a las 17:36 +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine
> > escribió:
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > I would suggest to provide a migration pack
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Emmanuel Bourg
* Package name: mimepull
Version : 1.9.7
Upstream Author : Oracle Corporation
* URL : https://javaee.github.io/metro-mimepull/
* License : CDDL-1.1 or GPL-2 with Classpath exception
Programming Lang: Java
Quoting Héctor Romojaro Gómez (2018-07-19 13:07:24)
> I will add a "Replaces" to the naviserver package once it hits sid and
> i am able to upload a newer version.
You can upload a newer version now, while package is stillin NEW queue.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-ark
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 01:07:24PM +0200, Héctor Romojaro Gómez wrote:
We have naviserver in NEW [0] (for four months but okay). I don't see
any reference to the aolserver4 package. I was expecting something
like
Provides:/Replaces:/Package: for a transitional package to move all
users from aolse
On Thursday, 19 July 2018 7:43:39 PM AEST Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> weboob itself is fine, maybe. But there are various other binaries
> inside the weboob packages that aren't, at least not so much:
>
> wetboobs
> handjoob
> boobsize
> boobtracker
>
> like, seriously.
Yuck... :( Incredibly tastel
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aggelos Avgerinos
* Package name: golang-github-araddon-gou
Version : 0.0~git20180509.7db4be5-1
Upstream Author : Aaron Raddon
* URL : https://github.com/araddon/gou
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: Go
Description
El jue, 19-07-2018 a las 13:18 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard escribió:
> Quoting Héctor Romojaro Gómez (2018-07-19 13:07:24)
> > I will add a "Replaces" to the naviserver package once it hits sid
> > and
> > i am able to upload a newer version.
>
> You can upload a newer version now, while package is s
El jue, 19-07-2018 a las 13:52 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine escribió:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 01:07:24PM +0200, Héctor Romojaro Gómez
> wrote:
> > > We have naviserver in NEW [0] (for four months but okay). I don't
> > > see
> > > any reference to the aolserver4 package. I was expecting
> > > so
On Thu, 2018-07-19 at 06:16 +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] Michael Stone
>
> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 03:14:20PM +0200, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
> > > It writes to `/dev/shm` which is not disk.
> >
> > All else that's been said aside, this idea is also dangerously
> > incorrect in a typical co
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:02:23PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
I see your point and I agree with you yet renaming might still be
inappropriate and/or ineffective. I'd like to see stronger
justification for replacing uncomfortable reference to part of human
body because why should it be uncomfort
Thanks Marc for raising this on -devel. I am the person who originally
brought attention to the package on -private. I did so there, because
I did not feel confident in doing so in a public space initially. It
wasn't my intention to irritate upstream by talking behind their back,
so I'm sorry for
I've recently made the first release of ick, my CI engine
(https://ick.liw.fi/), which was built by ick itself. It went OK, but
the process needs improvement. This mail has some pondering on how
the process of building Debian packages should happen in the best
possible taste.
I'd appreciate feedba
Hello,
one short remark
Am 19.07.2018 um 18:06 schrieb Lars Wirzenius:
> I've recently made the first release of ick, my CI engine
> (https://ick.liw.fi/), which was built by ick itself. It went OK, but
> the process needs improvement. This mail has some pondering on how
> the process of building
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 06:49:11PM +0200, Mechtilde wrote:
> Please regard that foo_1.2-1~debian9 is greater than foo_1.2-1~debian10,
> which stand for Debian Buster
Nope:
dpkg --compare-versions 1.2-1~debian9 lt 1.2-1~debian10
In Debian versions, like in all modern version comparison schemes, a
Hideki Yamane schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 18 May 2018 10:29:03 +0200
> Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>> > Does it fail like in bug #858153 (which has a patch) or in a different way?
>>
>> That bug is a year old and for 0.19, not sure if it's still any relevant
>> for current releases, when trying to r
On 2018-07-19 13:52:04 [+0200], Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > > I am currious now if I am allowed to reassing [2] over to
> > > ftp.debian.org
> > > for the removal.
> >
> > Fine for me, let's wait for Frankie's opinion.
>
> I would propose a replace roadmap for people using aolserver4 (in bo
On Jul 18, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Some day it may replace crypt(3), currently provided by glibc:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_glibc_libcrypt_with_libxcrypt
I tried creating a package which would divert libc's libcrypt, but it
appears to be much harder than I thought.
Installi
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 1268 (new: 1)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 164 (new: 1)
Total number of packages reques
On Friday, 20 July 2018 12:50:12 AM AEST Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> Have you read Matthew Vernon's reply to OP in this thread? Does that not
> explain it?
Matthew did not convince me. IMHO his explanation is weak as it boils down to
"there are many problems like this and we should fix this problem
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 01:34:19PM +1000, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
On Friday, 20 July 2018 12:50:12 AM AEST Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Have you read Matthew Vernon's reply to OP in this thread? Does that not
explain it?
Matthew did not convince me. IMHO his explanation is weak as it boils down to
"t
23 matches
Mail list logo
