El jue, 19-07-2018 a las 13:52 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine escribió: > On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 01:07:24PM +0200, Héctor Romojaro Gómez > wrote: > > > We have naviserver in NEW [0] (for four months but okay). I don't > > > see > > > any reference to the aolserver4 package. I was expecting > > > something > > > like > > > Provides:/Replaces:/Package: for a transitional package to move > > > all > > > users from aolserver4 over to naviserver. > > > > I will add a "Replaces" to the naviserver package once it hits sid > > and > > i am able to upload a newer version. > > > > > I am currious now if I am allowed to reassing [2] over to > > > ftp.debian.org > > > for the removal. > > > > Fine for me, let's wait for Frankie's opinion. > > > > > There is also ITP for naviserver-modules [1] so I could then file > > > a > > > RM > > > for aolserver4-nsopenssl which I what I planned in the beginning. > > > Any objections? > > > > nsopenssl is replaced by naviserver itself, as it includes now the > > nsssl module, so there is no need to wait for the modules package > > :) > > > > I would propose a replace roadmap for people using aolserver4 (in > both testing > and stable) with usual replaces/provides/conflicts items, and add a > *big* warn > in NEWS about known changes and incompatibilities.
There is a full upstream NEWS file including those: https://salsa.debian.org/tcltk-team/naviserver/blob/master/NEWS Not so easy to digest (~900 lines), but it is exhaustive. We could include it in /usr/share/doc/naviserver/ and point the user to it in the NEWS.Debian file. Kind regards, Héctor
