On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 07:55:05 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> FWIW there is an article about it on
> http://lwn.net/Articles/590879/
Thanks but LWN subscription is needed to read...
(Alternatively, this item will become freely available on March 27, 2014).
--
Regards,
Dmitry Smirnov
GPG key : 4096R/53
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 07:55:05 Andreas Metzler wrote:
>> FWIW there is an article about it on
>> http://lwn.net/Articles/590879/
>
> Thanks but LWN subscription is needed to read...
> (Alternatively, this item will become freely available on Ma
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 02:16:10PM +0100, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> I think it should be in every report. reportbug currently adds the kernel
> version and what /bin/sh points to, and for both of those it can just as
> well be argued that they are not relevant to the majority of bug reports.
> For t
]] Dmitry Smirnov
> On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 07:55:05 Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > FWIW there is an article about it on
> > http://lwn.net/Articles/590879/
>
> Thanks but LWN subscription is needed to read...
Use http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/590879/fef0c71560078461/
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:53:55AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Steve Langasek, le Sat 22 Mar 2014 12:43:56 -0700, a écrit :
> > Um, no, build-depending on virtual packages is absolutely allowed.
>
> Yes, but something has to make the buildd pick up one package which
> provides it. It won't de
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Weber writes:
> And for those packages where it does not matter, it will cost extra
> developer concentration/time in ignoring the noise. Sorry, but this
> feels like being good for some, bad for all others. Developers
> interested in the information should add bug scripts now a
Jon Bernard and Thaddeus H. Black of the Debian Project
will be signing GPG keys in Blacksburg, Virginia, Tues.,
March 25. If you are in the area and wish your key
signed by two Debian Developers, or if you need to
update your key to 4096R strength [1], you can attend.
Date: Tues., March 25, 201
Hi everyone!
When there's a package transition for a package that is currently in
Stable, it's obvious that the transition packages should be available on
the next stable release.
But when the package isn't in stable (yet), and is only in Sid/testing,
how long should a transition package last? Un
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 08:41:48AM +0100, Thomas Weber wrote:
> And while we are at it, do we *really* need the information about
> /bin/sh in at least a significant share of today's bug reports?
You probably want it, because a decent number of people use a shell
other than bash or dash as /bin/sh
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Georges Khaznadar
* Package name: geophar
Version : 13.04.5
Upstream Author : Nicolas Pourcelot
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/geophar/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Swiss arm
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: matthewp
* Package name: node-eventemitter2
Version : 0.4.13
Upstream Author : hij1nx
* URL : https://www.npmjs.org/package/eventemitter2
* License : MIT
Programming Lang: js
Description : A Node.js event emitter
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 08:54:20 Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> Use http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/590879/fef0c71560078461/
Interesting article (thank you for link).
I just want to note that Startcom is no match to cacert.org in regards to free
SSL certificates. Some years ago I got free certificate from St
I suggest that anybody who wants to partecipate to this debate should
clarify if their goal is:
- choosing appropriate defaults for the general population of our users
- taking a stand against the PKI system
Anyway, I strongly recommend that nobody waste their time on an issue
which in a couple
13 matches
Mail list logo
