Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: tuskar
Version : 0.0.5
Upstream Author : OpenStack Development Mailing List
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/tuskar
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang: Python
Description
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:49:15AM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> I'm hacking something ugly meanwhile for my own needs, but you can
> count on me to test building against varnish 4 as soon as the
> experimental version is out.
varnish 4 tech preview 1 is now in debian experimental.
I've tested that
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Thomas Goirand
* Package name: python-tuskarclient
Version : 0.0.5
Upstream Author : OpenStack Development Mailing List
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/python-tuskarclient/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang
On Sunday, December 15, 2013 08:33:34 AM Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 08:27:45PM +0530, V.Krishn wrote:
> > On Friday, December 13, 2013 08:31:51 PM you wrote:
> > > Was going through LSB Core 4.1.
> > >
> > > I am looking at LSB core section 20.8 ...
> > >
> > > Confirming set
On 14.12.2013, at 23:53, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
wrote:
> On 12/14/2013 11:07 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
>>> Package: mplayer
>>> Severity: serious
>>>
>>> Should this package be removed? If so, please reassign to ftp.debian.org
>
On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 11:53 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Well, to be honest, I think the problem is actually libav, not mplayer.
> Most users prefer the original ffmpeg over libav from my own experience.
>
Agreed
Furthermore, I still do not understand
On 2013-12-02 23:59, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Hi all,
>
Hi,
> am I wrong or among the supporters of the concept of release goals,
> there are no members of the release team themselves ? If yes, then
> it may be more fruitful to explore alternatives.
>
I think there are (or, at least, were) som
On 2013-11-29 10:48, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 21:04 +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> In this new and exciting update from your Debian Release Team...
>
>> kFreeBSD was a technology preview, and has not generated enough user
>> interest to bring in sufficient install base to cont
On 2013-11-29 10:27, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
> Le 28/11/2013 21:52, Niels Thykier a écrit :
>>> [...]
>>
>> Keeping them around is different from them being considered as release
>> architectures (or even just keeping them in testing). Keeping these
>> architectures in testing do involve a burden,
❦ 15 décembre 2013 10:21 CET, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen :
> The needed header files, as well as "vmodtool.py" are in the
> "libvarnishapi-dev" package. I've not tested building a vmod against
> it yet.
With Varnish 3, we were including "bin/varnishd/cache.h". Since Varnish
4 ships "usr/include/var
* Niels Thykier (ni...@thykier.net) [131215 12:36]:
> In practise, it has not worked out so well. In my experience, many
> of the Wheezy release goals became "second-rate" goals - we simply
> failed to follow up on those goals as we promised, we would. To me,
> release goals became "that outsta
2013/12/15 Reimar Döffinger :
> On 14.12.2013, at 23:53, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
>> On 12/14/2013 11:07 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>>> On Sat, Dec 14, 2013 at 4:28 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Package: mplayer
Severity: serious
Should this package be removed? If
On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 11:27:37 -0800, Russ Allbery
wrote:
>If Policy says anything, I suspect we'll say that having a disable flag in
>/etc/default is considered harmful and packages should instead document
>that update-rc.d disable should be used for this purpose (and perhaps
>migrate the disabled
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:22:27 -0800, Steve Langasek
wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:02:21AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> Steve Langasek dixit:
>
>> >(For values of "permanently" that include "we now have two implementations
>> >of sh in Essential, because no one has done the work to let us g
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: David Maiorino
* Package name: Open Time Zone Converter
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : David Maiorino
* URL : https://github.com/DMaiorino/TimeZoneConverter
* License : MIT/X
Programming Lang: Java
Description
On Sun, 2013-12-15 at 16:06 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:22:27 -0800, Steve Langasek
> wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:02:21AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> >> Steve Langasek dixit:
> >
> >> >(For values of "permanently" that include "we now have two implementations
> >
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 07:07:54PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-12-15 at 16:06 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:22:27 -0800, Steve Langasek
> > wrote:
> > >On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:02:21AM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > >> Steve Langasek dixit:
> > >> >(For v
Bálint Réczey schrieb:
> How about introducing the ffmpeg shared libraries with libffmpeg
> prefix instead of libav prefix?
No way. Keeping up with security fixes for libav is tedious enough,
we cannot reasonably have both.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ
On 12/15/2013 10:11 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> Bálint Réczey schrieb:
>> How about introducing the ffmpeg shared libraries with libffmpeg
>> prefix instead of libav prefix?
>
> No way. Keeping up with security fixes for libav is tedious enough,
> we cannot reasonably have both.
So, the alte
2013/12/15 John Paul Adrian Glaubitz :
> On 12/15/2013 10:11 PM, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>> Bálint Réczey schrieb:
>>> How about introducing the ffmpeg shared libraries with libffmpeg
>>> prefix instead of libav prefix?
>>
>> No way. Keeping up with security fixes for libav is tedious enough,
>>
On Sun, 2013-12-15 at 11:54 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 07:07:54PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-12-15 at 16:06 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> > > On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:22:27 -0800, Steve Langasek
> > > wrote:
> > > >On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:02:21AM +,
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Regarding xbmc please don't remove it.
> It works with libav to some extent and I'm tyring to convince upstream to
> let me join the team responsible for packaging. I plan keeping xbmc working
> with libav unless ffmpeg gets reintroduced to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Debian Med team"
* Package name: probabel
Version : 0.4.1
Upstream Author : L.C. Karssen
* URL : http://www.genabel.org/packages/ProbABEL
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C, C++, Perl
Description : Toolset for
23 matches
Mail list logo
