On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 11:27:37 -0800, Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org>
wrote:
>If Policy says anything, I suspect we'll say that having a disable flag in
>/etc/default is considered harmful and packages should instead document
>that update-rc.d disable should be used for this purpose (and perhaps
>migrate the disabled flag to update-rc.d disable on upgrade).

If the article on
http://blog.zugschlus.de/archives/974-Debians-Policy-rc.d-infrastructure-explained.html
is of any help, I will happily put it under a free license so that
Debian can freely copy-paste from there.

Greetings
Marc
-- 
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber         |   " Questions are the         | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany  |     Beginning of Wisdom "     | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vsdfl-0000on...@swivel.zugschlus.de

Reply via email to