On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 11:27:37 -0800, Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org> wrote: >If Policy says anything, I suspect we'll say that having a disable flag in >/etc/default is considered harmful and packages should instead document >that update-rc.d disable should be used for this purpose (and perhaps >migrate the disabled flag to update-rc.d disable on upgrade).
If the article on http://blog.zugschlus.de/archives/974-Debians-Policy-rc.d-infrastructure-explained.html is of any help, I will happily put it under a free license so that Debian can freely copy-paste from there. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vsdfl-0000on...@swivel.zugschlus.de