Re: moving (old-)master.debian.org to a (new-)master.debian.org 

2013-02-17 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Tue Feb 05, 2013 at 19:40:37 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Before we start losing data (we already lost one disk), DSA is moving  > master's services to a new machine. The new machine is already setup,  > but not all the data has been moved. DSA will do a final copy of the > data (YES

Re: REJECTed B-U packages (was Re: RFC declarative built-using field generation)

2013-02-17 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Thorsten Glaser (17/02/2013): > So please brainstorm on a fix. In the meantime, dear fellow > buildd admins, please do run apt-get dist-upgrade (following > an apt-get update if you don’t persist those) in *all* of your > buildd chroots frequently and handle those REJECTs caused by > Built-Using b

Re: REJECTed B-U packages (was Re: RFC declarative built-using field generation)

2013-02-17 Thread Thorsten Glaser
Cyril Brulebois dixit: >In the meantime, dear Thorsten Glaser, please do figure out that >mailing debian-devel@ is *not* the way to reach buildd admins. I know, and it wasn’t the goal of that mail. I already contacted those in question once. bye, //mirabilos -- „nein: BerliOS und Sourceforge si

Re: RFC declarative built-using field generation

2013-02-17 Thread Philipp Kern
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:41:26AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > Am 10.02.2013 23:31, schrieb Philipp Kern: > > On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 03:01:21PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> But it is ok to insist on using the exact binary version for > >> build-depending on source packages when it's not ne

Q: license change for code component in RFCs

2013-02-17 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, I've found the document that RFC copyright policy was changed in 2008, so I want to share a bit about it. RFC document itself is still non-DFSG-free one, but the **code** in RFC after 2008-11-10 can be used under BSD-3-clause license as RFC 5378. So, we can include _some code_ that was

Re: RFC declarative built-using field generation

2013-02-17 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 17.02.2013 20:41, schrieb Philipp Kern: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:41:26AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Am 10.02.2013 23:31, schrieb Philipp Kern: >>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 03:01:21PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: But it is ok to insist on using the exact binary version for buil

Re: openjdk maintenance for wheezy and squeeze

2013-02-17 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Matthias Klose writes: > - Afaik openjdk-7 for kfreebsd does build on kfreebsd (according to Damien) >with the kfreebsd kernel from wheezy. So maybe some commitment could be >found to upgrade and maintain the kernels before wheezy is released? Actually as far as I could narrow it