Am 17.02.2013 20:41, schrieb Philipp Kern: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:41:26AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >> Am 10.02.2013 23:31, schrieb Philipp Kern: >>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 03:01:21PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: >>>> But it is ok to insist on using the exact binary version for >>>> build-depending on source packages when it's not needed? This only >>>> seems to be driven by the current dak implementation. >>> That doesn't make sense to me. Where did somebody require this? >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2013/01/msg00012.html >> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/01/msg00711.html maybe it's a >> coincidence, however creduce was formerly rejected for not having a >> Built-Using attribute, and gcj-4.8, gnat-4.7 and gnat-4.8 are still in >> NEW. > > Both links talk of Built-Using not Build-Depends. See above for what you > wrote. ;-)
Sorry, I would like to share your amusement. So please explain. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/512166a6.6020...@debian.org