brian m. carlson schrieb am Friday, den 13. January 2012:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:57:37AM +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > On Fr 13 Jan 2012 00:37:57 CET Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> > >forked monolithic X.org 6.9 source tree.
> >
> > This is indeed the case.
>
> I can't speak for the ftp
Hi Alex,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 08:55:17 CET Alexander Wirt wrote:
brian m. carlson schrieb am Friday, den 13. January 2012:
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:57:37AM +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> On Fr 13 Jan 2012 00:37:57 CET Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
> >forked monolithic X.org 6.9 source tree.
>
>
Op 13-01-12 02:22, John A. Sullivan III schreef:
> As SPICE improves, I think we should consider it
> seriously. Its cross platform support is very good which would no
> longer limit X2Go server to Windows only and the idea of an adaptive
> protocol is absolutely intriguing. I long for the day w
Mike Gabriel schrieb am Freitag, den 13. Januar 2012:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Fr 13 Jan 2012 08:55:17 CET Alexander Wirt wrote:
>
> >brian m. carlson schrieb am Friday, den 13. January 2012:
> >
> >>On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:57:37AM +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> >>> On Fr 13 Jan 2012 00:37:57 CET Stef
Hi Paul, hi John,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 09:30:09 CET Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Op 13-01-12 02:22, John A. Sullivan III schreef:
As SPICE improves, I think we should consider it
seriously. Its cross platform support is very good which would no
longer limit X2Go server to Windows only and the idea
Hi Alex,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 10:00:29 CET Alexander Wirt wrote:
Note that we have tested loads of different build variants against
Xorg 7. The highest stability (which is virtually no session crashes
anymore) we ever achieved is by the way we currently build the code
as one monolith.
This is not
clone 655618 -1
retitle 655618 ITP: nx-libs-light --- NX Protocol client-only libraries and
binaries
retitle -1 ITP: nx-libs --- NX Protocol client/server libraries and binaries
stop
On Fr, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:20:15 (CET), Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Paul, hi John,
>
> On Fr 13 Jan 2012 09:30:09 CET
Hi Reinhard, dear all,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 11:31:00 CET Reinhard Tartler wrote:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/x2go/nx-libs.git;a=tree
and, from what I see, is appropriate for being uploaded to unstable. For
clarity, I think we should rename the git repository from nx-libs.git t
On 01/13/2012 05:23 PM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Fr 13 Jan 2012 10:00:29 CET Alexander Wirt wrote:
>
>>> Note that we have tested loads of different build variants against
>>> Xorg 7. The highest stability (which is virtually no session crashes
>>> anymore) we ever achieved is by the w
Hi Thomas,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 12:10:16 CET Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 01/13/2012 05:23 PM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 10:00:29 CET Alexander Wirt wrote:
Note that we have tested loads of different build variants against
Xorg 7. The highest stability (which is virtually no s
Hi Reinhard, hi all,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 11:31:00 CET Reinhard Tartler wrote:
clone 655618 -1
retitle 655618 ITP: nx-libs-light --- NX Protocol client-only
libraries and binaries
retitle -1 ITP: nx-libs --- NX Protocol client/server libraries and binaries
stop
Once you know the BTS no. of th
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:35:30 +0100, Mike Gabriel
wrote:
...
> Everything in this mail is just a guess, things in reality have very
> probably been completely different.
Yes, having talked to the lead developer on NX _years_ ago (2003 IIRC),
he spent quite some time trying to persuade the X fol
Hi Phil,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 12:50:37 CET Philip Hands wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:35:30 +0100, Mike Gabriel
wrote:
...
Everything in this mail is just a guess, things in reality have very
probably been completely different.
Yes, having talked to the lead developer on NX _years_ ago (2003
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Stummvoll
I'm planning to upload this new package through a sponsor
* Package name: template
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Michael Stummvoll
* URL : http://stuff.stummi.org/template.html
* License : GPL
Prog
On 13.01.2012 03:18, Roger Leigh wrote:
[]
> All are currently broken. Whether they cause severe breakage depends
> upon the individual case. Some are working apparently OK, e.g.
> mdadm. Others are doing broken things to try and create device nodes
For mdadm an upstream patch is needed. I alr
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 08:39:02AM +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> And still, my basic (inner and outer) question is:
>
> 1. how can we enrol other people with our endeavour
> 2. what is needed to enrol people
> 3. is there anyonr in this discussion who can point us to next possible steps
>
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:50:37AM +, Philip Hands wrote:
> Yes, having talked to the lead developer on NX _years_ ago (2003 IIRC),
> he spent quite some time trying to persuade the X folks that he had ways
> of getting rid of (largely pointless) round-trips and the like. He said
> that having
Le jeudi 12 janvier 2012 à 20:22 -0500, John A. Sullivan III a écrit :
> I am very concerned about the old X code, too and we are actively
> watching SPICE. SPICE has extraordinary potential but it is still
> slower than NX on WAN links - not much but enough to make a user
> noticeable difference
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 02:55:06PM +0100, Michael Stummvoll wrote:
>On 13.01.2012 14:52, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>Why do we need this? Does it need to be a separate package for a
>>very simple utility program?
>do you think it has better chances to get in a package like moreutils
>instead of as own?
Michael Stummvoll wrote:
>Package: wnpp
>Severity: wishlist
>Owner: Michael Stummvoll
>
>I'm planning to upload this new package through a sponsor
>
>* Package name: template
> Version : 0.1
> Upstream Author : Michael Stummvoll
>* URL : http://stuff.stummi.org/template.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 05:01:54PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> On 13.01.2012 03:18, Roger Leigh wrote:
> []
> > All are currently broken. Whether they cause severe breakage depends
> > upon the individual case. Some are working apparently OK, e.g.
> > mdadm. Others are doing broken things to
On Fr, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:10:16 (CET), Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 01/13/2012 05:23 PM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> On Fr 13 Jan 2012 10:00:29 CET Alexander Wirt wrote:
>>
Note that we have tested loads of different build variants against
Xorg 7. The highest stability (which is
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: James Page
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
* Package name: stapler-adjunct-codemirror
Version : 1.1
* URL : http://github.com/stapler/stapler-adjunct-codemirror
* License : MIR
Programming Lang: Java/Java
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 15:03 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 12 janvier 2012 à 20:22 -0500, John A. Sullivan III a écrit :
> > I am very concerned about the old X code, too and we are actively
> > watching SPICE. SPICE has extraordinary potential but it is still
> > slower than NX on WAN
On 01/13/2012 10:03 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I am surprised NX is even considered for WAN usage. Our in-house tests
> showed that NX has a noticeable usability impact as soon as the latency
> reaches 10ms, while the figure goes up to 30ms for VNC - which is
> currently the only serious solutio
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 15:43:03 +0100
Michael Stummvoll wrote:
> On 13.01.2012 15:36, Neil Williams wrote:
> > $ printenv|grep GDM_LANG|sed -e 's/GDM_LANG=//'
> >
> > #!/bin/sh
> > GLANG=`printenv|grep GDM_LANG|sed -e 's/GDM_LANG=//'`
> > echo $GLANG
> >
> > Why is that hard?
> >
> did you really re
Le vendredi 13 janvier 2012 à 22:42 +0800, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
> Seriously, have you ever tried using VNC across continents, with a
> *very* slow link? It's simply too slow, it takes ages to display a simple
> window.
latency != bandwidth
VNC requires more bandwidth, but being asynchronous,
On Jan 13, 2012 3:59 PM, "Thomas Goirand" wrote:
>
> On 01/13/2012 10:03 PM, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > I am surprised NX is even considered for WAN usage. Our in-house tests
> > showed that NX has a noticeable usability impact as soon as the latency
> > reaches 10ms, while the figure goes up to
On 12-01-13 at 02:51pm, James Page wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: James Page
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> * Package name: stapler-adjunct-codemirror
> Version : 1.1
> * URL : http://github.com/stapler/stapler-adjunct-co
Hi
On Friday 13 January 2012, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 08:39:02AM +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > And still, my basic (inner and outer) question is:
> >
> > 1. how can we enrol other people with our endeavour
> > 2. what is needed to enrol people
> > 3. is there a
Hi
On Friday 13 January 2012, Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
[...]
> > 1. Did anybody *really* *honestly* tried to base NX protocol
> > on plain X libraries? If this is not possible
>
> FreeNX upstream tried to rebase them to X.org long time ago and claimed
This was intended to mean modu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Jonas
On 13/01/12 16:12, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> This library provides a JavaScript based codemirror source code
>> visualisation
>>> component for embedding in web applications using the stapler
>>> HTTP request handling engine.
> How is this
On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:11:50 +0100
Michael Stummvoll wrote:
> On 13.01.2012 16:00, Neil Williams wrote:
> > The point about sed is that sed can substitute whatever you like into
> > whatever you like - printenv with grep and sed gets the value, then
> > another grep for the lines that matter and
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ole Streicher
* Package name: wcstools
Version : 3.8.4
Upstream Author : Doug Mink
* URL : http://tdc-www.harvard.edu/software/wcstools/
* License : GPLv2+
Programming Lang: C
Description : Create display and ma
Hi
On Friday 13 January 2012, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Reinhard, dear all,
>
> On Fr 13 Jan 2012 11:31:00 CET Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>
> > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/x2go/nx-libs.git;a=tree
> > and, from what I see, is appropriate for being uploaded to unstable. For
> > cl
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 13.01.2012, 10:46 +0100 schrieb Ole Streicher:
>Description : Create display and manipulate the world coordinate
> system
This should somehow mention that you are modifying picture; I would not
want a software in Debian that allows anyone to manipulate the
coordinate
On 07/01/12 13:39, Savvas Radevic wrote:
Typing monitor to force typing breaks. It's a GNOME 3 tool that forces you to
take regular breaks to prevent RSI (Repetitive Strain Injury).
What a blast from the past!
drwright used to be a GNOME 2 panel app that did exactly the same thing;
it was e
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 22:11:35 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> There are 19 packages still using /dev/.udev after udev transitioned
> to /run/udev. Unless there are any objections, I'd like to raise the
> severity of these bugs from important to serious, given that the /run
> migration is a release
On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 22:11 +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> There are 19 packages still using /dev/.udev after udev transitioned
> to /run/udev. Unless there are any objections, I'd like to raise the
> severity of these bugs from important to serious, given that the /run
> migration is a release goal.
Hi Stefan, hi all,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 17:14:08 CET Stefan Lippers-Hollmann wrote:
Hi
On Friday 13 January 2012, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Reinhard, dear all,
On Fr 13 Jan 2012 11:31:00 CET Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/x2go/nx-libs.git;a=tree
> and,
Hi,
I was concerned about an issue Charles Plessy reported in a recent
thread on Debian Med when he realised that the directories in the
unpacked tarball are featuring his UID/GID. I simply looked into the
uscan source how it is be done there and found:
GZIP=-9 tar --owner=root --group=root -
Andreas Tille writes:
> I was concerned about an issue Charles Plessy reported in a recent
> thread on Debian Med when he realised that the directories in the
> unpacked tarball are featuring his UID/GID.
Do we care? Most upstream distribution tarballs are likewise going to
feature random UIDs
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 22:07 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I was concerned about an issue Charles Plessy reported in a recent
> thread on Debian Med when he realised that the directories in the
> unpacked tarball are featuring his UID/GID. I simply looked into the
> uscan source how it is be done t
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 01:12:32PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> Do we care? Most upstream distribution tarballs are likewise going to
> feature random UIDs and GIDs in the tarball because that's what you get
> from tar if you don't take any special precautions.
I admit that the issue might not
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 09:18:53PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 22:07 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I was concerned about an issue Charles Plessy reported in a recent
> > thread on Debian Med when he realised that the directories in the
> > unpacked tarball are featuring
Andreas Tille writes:
> I admit that the issue might not be very important but I personally like
> reproducible results (in the sense of same MD5sums). At least it can
> not harm even if I admit that upstream does not care - in some points we
> are better than upstream. So why not doing it if i
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Thomas Thurman wrote:
> Plover is a stenotype input method for X11. It allows input of English text
> using
> chords rather than letter by letter, enabling typing speeds to approach 300wpm
> for a skilled user. It can use a dedicated stenotype machine, or a standar
47 matches
Mail list logo