retitle 489132 upgrade apt/aptitude first
thanks
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Is it still correct that dpkg needs to be upgraded first before doing a
> dist-upgrade from Etch? With perl-base 5.10.0-14 pre-depending on a
> fixed version of dpkg, that should not be the case anymore, A
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:03:13AM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> I upgraded a dom0 I maintain to Lenny, the kernel got upgraded and I had
> of course a boot failure when trying to boot Xen 3.2 and linux 2.6.26.
> I'm not really sure about the reason since it is a remotely hosted box,
> but
On 2008-09-18, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The situation is now critical, indeed. Even though the decision is not
>> yet taken, there are risks that we (D-I team) finally decide to
>> de-activate Danish.
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Trent W. Buck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The rst2pdf utility (see #496864) cannot create hyphenated output
without this library. Therefore I wish to package it for Debian.
Attached is a minimal, draft .diff.gz that I have created.
I do not intend to do further
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:57:40PM -0300, André Luís Lopes wrote:
> Bastian Blank escreveu:
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 06:52:38PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Next try: http://194.39.182.225/debian/xen/try2.
> >> Checksums:
| facc08ef408b745052189d99e971ee0d0c01450c
linux-headers-2.6.26-1-xen-6
Le mercredi 17 septembre 2008 à 19:52 -0500, Peter Samuelson a écrit :
> [Josselin Mouette]
> > Yes, but that could be worked around by making libncurses6 conflict with
> > libncurses5 (<< version.with.symbols).
>
> That only works if you rebuild everything that uses ncurses5 so the
> symbol _user
Bastian Blank schreef:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:57:40PM -0300, André Luís Lopes wrote:
>> Bastian Blank escreveu:
>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 06:52:38PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> Next try: http://194.39.182.225/debian/xen/try2.
>
Checksums:
> | facc08ef408b745052189d99e971ee0d0c014
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:20:19AM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> Bastian Blank schreef:
> > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:57:40PM -0300, André Luís Lopes wrote:
> >> Bastian Blank escreveu:
> >>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 06:52:38PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> >
> > Next try: http://194.39.182.22
On Thursday 18 September 2008, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:20:19AM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> > Bastian Blank schreef:
> > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:57:40PM -0300, André Luís Lopes wrote:
> > >> Bastian Blank escreveu:
> > >>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 06:52:38PM +0200
Bastian Blank schreef:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:20:19AM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>> Bastian Blank schreef:
>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:57:40PM -0300, André Luís Lopes wrote:
Bastian Blank escreveu:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 06:52:38PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>>> Next try:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:52:09AM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> I have it running on my amd64 machine!
Okay.
> - the VM's do not start automatically, but they start with "xm create".
Hmm. Please show the xend log (/var/log/xen/xend.log) from before the
manual start.
> - I can ping and SSH
Next try: http://194.39.182.225/debian/xen/try3.
Checksums:
| 5d551622550b95be67a33711f6691c92df9e6bc5
linux-headers-2.6.26-1-xen-686_2.6.26-6_i386.deb
| 18e74571304130b05b15343b6cca3f428f60c958
linux-headers-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64_2.6.26-6_amd64.deb
| f623276521dcf23416c12f1923015629e93f246c
li
[nothing in this email is private]
On 18 Sep 2008, at 11:53, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 18 September 2008 06:57, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
Except that, as reported by Jimmy, the version of the open use
logo with
the "Debian" name *does* suffer from this problem; which I think
is a
Hi,
Bastian Blank wrote:
> Next try: http://194.39.182.225/debian/xen/try3.
> This fixes a warning in the PCI registration and again uses xencons.
I tried both try2 and try3 amd64-debs on a Lenny server (without
previous xen install). After some initial errors (probably issues with
the bridge I f
Hi there!
Please Cc: me, I'm not subscribed to d-release. I cc:ed d-devel FYI,
but I think this discussion belongs to d-release, please continue there.
I just discovered a "bug" with the etch-and-a-half kernel [1].
Actually, it's not really a bug, but it clearly needs an entry in the
release not
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 17 septembre 2008 à 19:52 -0500, Peter Samuelson a écrit :
> > [Josselin Mouette]
> > > Yes, but that could be worked around by making libncurses6 conflict with
> > > libncurses5 (<< version.with.symbols).
> >
> > That only works if you re
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:22:07AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Daniel Baumann:
>
> > Steve Langasek wrote:
> >> In that case: no, please fix your ncurses 6 package to provide a proper
> >> transition path by adding Provides: libncurses5-dev.
> >
> > that won't work in all cases, the soname ma
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:01:21AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Mabye it would work if we'd add symbols to the current ncurses, rebuild
> > everything, then introduce the new one with the new symbols?
>
> Unless we do this step /before/ the release of lenny, there will still be
> issues on par
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 22:20:16 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:01:21AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > Mabye it would work if we'd add symbols to the current ncurses, rebuild
> > > everything, then introduce the new one with the new symbols?
> >
> > Unless we do this step /
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 15:20, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm... lenny+1=squeeze
yeah, it was announched by Luk at here[1].
Cheers,
Sandro
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/09/msg0.html
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, Morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website
Hi!
Osamu Aoki schrieb:
> Hmmm... lenny+1=squeeze
>
> This is my first sighting :-)
Sometimes it's worth to read these "Release update" mails comming in
till the end:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/09/msg0.html ;)
Best regards,
Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmmm... lenny+1=squeeze
>
> This is my first sighting :-)
In Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, posted 2008-09-01:
We are happy to publish yet another issue of our highly successful
motivational status updates. This month's issue contains, as
Hi all,
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 23:08:27 Anton Martchukov wrote:
> On 9/17/08, Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If we need virtual package scripts in init.d than I see now to options:
> > >
> > > 1) Use a script instead of symlink with different lsb headers (this
> >
[Anton Martchukov]
> Can we work out a common solution for the problem? Now apcupsd,
> genpower, nut (in testing), powstatd create ups-monitor symlink in
> init.d since they provide ups-monitor virtual package. However,
> insserv cannot solve dependencies since it discovers several init
> scripts p
Hello,
I'm subscribed, no need to CC me.
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 09:01 +0200, Gabor Gombas wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:03:13AM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
>
> > I upgraded a dom0 I maintain to Lenny, the kernel got upgraded and I had
> > of course a boot failure when trying to boot
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 14:39 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> Indeed, what would this imply for our LSB compatibility?
>
> http://refspecs.linux-foundation.org/LSB_3.2.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/libncurses.html
>
> seems to say libncurses.so.5 is the required one, will we lose LSB
> compatib
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:02:14PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 14:39 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > Indeed, what would this imply for our LSB compatibility?
> >
> > http://refspecs.linux-foundation.org/LSB_3.2.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/libncurses.html
> >
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Upstream is doing that change; ncurses can't be forever stalled because
>> of LSB, you see.
>
> As I understand it, upstream simply mandates either libncurses.so.5 or
> libncurses.so.6 based on the configure flags for enabling mouse-wheel
> support. T
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 17:20:54 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> So the obvious solution seems to me then to build ncurses twice,
> providing both libncurses5 and libncurses6 packages. What point do I miss?
>
The crashes that will happen when both are loaded in a process's address
space.
Cheers
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:07:01PM +0200, Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:02:14PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 14:39 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > Indeed, what would this imply for our LSB compatibility?
> > >
> > > http:/
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 12:28:53PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Next try: http://194.39.182.225/debian/xen/try3.
> This fixes a warning in the PCI registration and again uses xencons.
This kernel have a critical problem:
| Bad pte = 11764060, process = vsftpd, vm_flags = 100071, vaddr = b7f85000
* Mike Hommey:
> ... and they couldn't add mouse-wheel support without breaking ABI ?
AFAICT, the issue is that there aren't enough bits in an int to express
all the button events in the same way as before. The new ABI reshuffles
the bits to make more room.
It should be possible to make this ch
Hello!
While working on a new version of the audit-package, I stumbled upon the
problem that /sbin/auditd explicitely checks several files and
directories for file-permissions, which are less than Debians standard
0755 and 0644. Here a list of those 6 files and the corresponding
description from t
Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 14:39 +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
Indeed, what would this imply for our LSB compatibility?
http://refspecs.linux-foundation.org/LSB_3.2.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/libncurses.html
seems to say libncurses.so.5 is the required one, wi
[+dickey]
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> So the obvious solution seems to me then to build ncurses twice,
>>> providing both libncurses5 and libncurses6 packages. What point do I miss?
>>
>>The crashes that will happen when both are loaded in a
>>pro
hi everyone,
while the EULA topic is already being discussed: there is at least one
other package in the debian archive which displays a click-through EULA,
namely xsane. could we agree on a policy addition that states that
individual packages may not do this, and be over with this nonsense for
Robert Lemmen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> while the EULA topic is already being discussed: there is at least one
> other package in the debian archive which displays a click-through EULA,
> namely xsane.
The one click-through that went away in 0.995-3?
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GN
Julien,
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 07:18:52PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> The one click-through that went away in 0.995-3?
If you are unsure of this and have to ask, you can look it up in the
changelog, maybe.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 07:18:52PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> > while the EULA topic is already being discussed: there is at least one
> > other package in the debian archive which displays a click-through EULA,
> > namely xsane.
>
> The one click-through that went away in 0.995-3?
yes, i didn
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The one click-through that went away in 0.995-3?
>
> If you are unsure of this and have to ask, you can look it up in the
> changelog, maybe.
I'm XSane's maintainer, in case you missed that.
JB.
--
Julien BLACHE - Debian & GNU/Linux Developer - <[EM
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Dan Kegel wrote:
[+dickey]
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So the obvious solution seems to me then to build ncurses twice,
providing both libncurses5 and libncurses6 packages. What point do I miss?
The crashes that will happen
(private CC just in case, sorry if that's a small abuse, Sune)
Quoting Sune Vuorela ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On 2008-09-18, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> The situation is now critical, indeed. Even
* Thomas Dickey:
> Then in that case, it should be possible for someone to submit a patch
> which does that.
Yes, but ...
> I don't recall anyone mentioning it recently (other than this thread,
> for example). The ABI=6 code's been there a few years.
... from the upstream POV, this would be an
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Damien Raude-Morvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libcommons-jci-java
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation
* URL : http://commons.apache.org/jci/
* License : Apache-2.0
Programming Lang:
HI
I know if this mail is an Off Topic
Why there is not a devel php mailing list, It is different from other
packages building, different configuration, .. thanks
--
Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto ( KrLoS )
Free and OpenSource Software Developer
GNULinux Registered User #379182
GNULinux Registered
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Thomas Dickey:
Then in that case, it should be possible for someone to submit a patch
which does that.
Yes, but ...
I don't recall anyone mentioning it recently (other than this thread,
for example). The ABI=6 code's been there a few years.
.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> from the upstream POV, this would be another ABI transition.
>
> If there's no patch, there's nothing to discuss, then.
Going forward, though, can you avoid potential issues like this
by maintaining better ABI compat
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 13:40:14 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> from the upstream POV, this would be another ABI transition.
> >
> > If there's no patch, there's nothing to discuss, then.
>
> Going forward, though, can
Carlos Eduardo Sotelo Pinto wrote:
> HI
> I know if this mail is an Off Topic
>
> Why there is not a devel php mailing list, It is different from other
> packages building, different configuration, .. thanks
>
Have you...?
$ dpkg-query -W --showformat='${Maintainer}\n' php5
Debian PHP Maintain
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 01:40:14PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> from the upstream POV, this would be another ABI transition.
> >
> > If there's no patch, there's nothing to discuss, then.
>
> Going forward, though, ca
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Going forward, though, can you avoid potential issues like this
>> by maintaining better ABI compatibility between versions?
>> i.e. when you add a libncurses.so.7, can you make it so
>> that all apps that linked against
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 13:40:14 -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
from the upstream POV, this would be another ABI transition.
If there's no patch, there's nothing to discuss, th
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Damien Raude-Morvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libcommons-javaflow-java
Version : 0.0~svn20060411
Upstream Author : The Apache Software Foundation
* URL : http://commons.apache.org/sandbox/javaflow/
* License :
* Robert Lemmen:
> still: can we make this a policy item?
The GPL version 2 permits it to display copyright notices and warranty
disclaimers, without being allowed to patch them away. This can be made
more obnoxious than one-time click-through EULAs, I fear.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: asmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: duhdraw
Version : 2.7.9
Upstream Author : Ben Fowler, Pekka Enberg
* URL : http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/u/penberg/duhdraw/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libmodule-starter-plugin-cgiapp-perl
Version : 0.05
Upstream Author : Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp/
* Li
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 02:07:19PM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Julien Cristau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Going forward, though, can you avoid potential issues like this
> >> by maintaining better ABI compatibility between versions?
> >> i.e. when you add a libncu
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 460 (new: 15)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 122 (new: 0)
Total number of packages reques
58 matches
Mail list logo
