On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:57:40PM -0300, André Luís Lopes wrote: > Bastian Blank escreveu: > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 06:52:38PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
Next try: http://194.39.182.225/debian/xen/try2. > >> Checksums: | facc08ef408b745052189d99e971ee0d0c01450c linux-headers-2.6.26-1-xen-686_2.6.26-6_i386.deb | e819d7a6d849b738f39c4988b1f6c722f81eb5e1 linux-headers-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64_2.6.26-6_amd64.deb | 7b8659fd984f8a1711fd5324bed20ad5b3f168bc linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-686_2.6.26-6_i386.deb | 7e01af430254ac90203fcf4c0ba7bf49ca9c7e4d linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64_2.6.26-6_amd64.deb | e2b3ea5a57d3dfe89defe57c595a5a7f0025bbbc linux-modules-2.6.26-1-xen-686_2.6.26-6_i386.deb | 73e9bb968768e2920735f7eb77fd9667f0ffce20 linux-modules-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64_2.6.26-6_amd64.deb | 07ef8c3b6c4e2496afd3fc86347f5cf640a644f9 xen-linux-system-2.6.26-1-xen-686_2.6.26-6_i386.deb | ddfd7db322b8540cb0f606f974758e883d416a67 xen-linux-system-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64_2.6.26-6_amd64.deb > It seems the problem is that xen-linux-system-2.6.26-1-xen-686 > depends on xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-i386-pae | xen-hypervisor-3.1-1-i386-pae > but unstable doesn't have these packages. Unstable has only > xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-i386 and it doesn't provide > xen-hypervisor-3.2-1-i386-pae. Yes. Fixed in the new packages. > Anyway, I tried booting the dom0 provided by your > linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-686_2.6.26-6_i386.deb package and the machine > actually came up. I couldn't install any tool for creating VM later > (xen-tools, virtinst, virt-manager, etc) as the package dependency > systems were all trying to "fix" my system after the problem left by the > error reported earlier on this message when installing these packages. You could have just removed xen-linux-system-* as it is only a meta package without actual functionality. > However, I noticed the Xen kernel giving some WARNINGs when i booted > it and later asking me to install a "xen-friendly" version of > glibc/libc6 or moving my /lib/tls to /lib/tls.disabled unless I wanted > to my system to become slow. Yes. I removed that warning now as it makes more grief than good and is not included in the paravirt_ops implementation. > What I noticed, as the boot message said, was that the system became > really slow after I booted the Xen kernel. Running aptitude took two or > three times more time than running it under a non Xen-enabled kernel, > for example. This is the result of a bug in libc6-xen, set the following in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/lib6-xen.conf | hwcap 1 nosegneg and run ldconfig. See #499366. > I don't know if it was some mistake I did (probably), but it would be > nice if you could tell me if I should have done my testing in any other > way. I'll probably have a QuadCore machine at work which I could test it > in the next two or three days, so I woul be glad to test it there. I would appriciate any possible testing. Bastian -- Knowledge, sir, should be free to all! -- Harry Mudd, "I, Mudd", stardate 4513.3
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
