Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 11:56:36AM -0700, Mike Bird wrote:
>> On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 11:31, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> > On Apr 26, Mike Bird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > In working on (unsupported) dist-upgrades from Ubuntu/Breezy
>> > > to Debian/Etch
Le mercredi 26 avril 2006 à 09:14 -0700, Mike Bird a écrit :
> How else should I report this, if at all?
>
> In working on (unsupported) dist-upgrades from Ubuntu/Breezy
> to Debian/Etch I ran into a lot of failures due to missing
> gconf-schemas. A lot of gnome software uses gconf-schemas
> in p
(Sorry, forgot to post to list.)
On 4/27/06, Gonéri Le Bouder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On graphic software websites, in general the most visited page is the one with
> the screenshots because it give a good overview of the software.
> In general a screenshot is better that the limit
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 02:13:06PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 06:36:59AM -0500, David McGiven wrote:
> > The newer 2.6 series kernels support configuring the TCP/UDP port number
> > of the kernel lockd via the files /proc/sys/fs/nfs/nlm_tcpport and
> > /proc/sys/fs
On Thursday 27 April 2006 01:13, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> On 4/27/06, Gonéri Le Bouder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On graphic software websites, in general the most visited page is the one
> > with the screenshots because it give a good overview of the software. In
> > general a
On Sunday 23 April 2006 20:26, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jari Aalto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What we need and what should have been done a long time ago, is to
> > modularize profile to /etc/profile.d/ where each program is resposible
> > for shipping reasonable defaults. Redhad has done this l
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 12:53:12PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Thursday 27 April 2006 12:14, Sven Luther wrote:
> > 1) daily build business card and netinst isos are failing to build
> > since april 1, which means they don't include the broadcom tg3 module
> > at all, and are thus not really usa
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 13:23]:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 12:53:12PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > On Thursday 27 April 2006 12:14, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > 1) daily build business card and netinst isos are failing to build
> > > since april 1, which means they don't include the b
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 01:30:17PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I'd rather prefer if you don't overexegerate.
Yes, please restrict yourself to the levels of exaggeration which are
appropriate for Debian mailing lists. ;-)
SCNR,
Richard
--
__ _
|_) /| Richard Atterer | GnuPG key
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 01:30:17PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Oh fun, i don't have any commit access to the d-i repo anymore, so i can't
> > even fix this issue myself. This clearly shows the pettiness of the d-i
> > team,
> > i am disgusted. ...
> >
> > Dear fellow powerpc folk, this clearl
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 13:23]:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 12:53:12PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > On Thursday 27 April 2006 12:14, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > 1) daily build business card and netinst isos are failing to bui
* Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 13:53]:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 13:23]:
> > > Dear fellow powerpc folk, this clearly means that the debian support for
> > > powerpc is dead or almost so, and i s
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 01:59:54PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 13:53]:
> > On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 13:23]:
> > > > Dear fellow powerpc folk, this clearly means th
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:19:34PM +0200, Sven Luther
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was going to fix it, maybe it would have been fixed already, but no,
> the d-i team decided this otherwise.
You can't *commit*, but you still can send patches, can't you ?
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Of course, best that could happen now would be if someone just takes up
>> the loose ends, and tries to fix the issues - and I hope someone just
>> does.
>
> Yeah, problem is we where already there a month ago, and see what happened.
>
> I was going to fix
* Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 14:38]:
> I don't think you understand. There was not a peep on the list about
> anything being up with the daily image until Sven explicitely stated it.
> I would have expected the maintainer or others privy to the situation
> to ha
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:53:07PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 14:38]:
> > I don't think you understand. There was not a peep on the list about
> > anything being up with the daily image until Sven explicitely stated it.
> > I woul
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:19:34PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Because they kicked out the powerpc porter ? Do you not think this is reason
> enough to consider debian for powerpc dead
No, this is only reason enough to look for a new powerpc porter.
Michael
--
"Zu Bundeswehrzeiten hab ich mir
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:40:08PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> Of course, best that could happen now would be if someone just takes up
> >> the loose ends, and tries to fix the issues - and I hope someone just
> >> does.
> >
> > Yeah, problem is we wh
Sven,
When will you learn you don't have to reply to every single message in a
thread ? Frank's and my message were the exact same. Why do you feel you
have to answer twice to the same thing ?
And please stop this "Friendly" signature, it's pathetic and actually
sounds stupid.
Mike
On Thu, Apr
Hi,
I'm thinking of doing a few things and possibly meeting some people
over there. The things that are in my mind but I don't think I will be
able to get everything done. I'd definitely be doing the first task,
but I would really love help on the rest. There are too many options
to try, and I def
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:15:17PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:19:34PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Because they kicked out the powerpc porter ? Do you not think this is reason
> > enough to consider debian for powerpc dead
>
> No, this is only reason enough to look f
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:27:35PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:19:34PM +0200, Sven Luther
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was going to fix it, maybe it would have been fixed already, but no,
> > the d-i team decided this otherwise.
>
> You can't *commit*, but you stil
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:07:36PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:27:35PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:19:34PM +0200, Sven Luther
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I was going to fix it, maybe it would have been fixed alread
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > I would have expected to see some mention of it on the list so people who
> > don't stay on IRC (and people who are only interested in the ppc
architecture)
> > would know what was going on.
>
> I never doubted that. :)
>
I don't think yo
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:17:08PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:07:36PM +0200, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:27:35PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:19:34PM +0200, Sven Luther
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 01:20, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gconf2/news/20050907T233205Z.html
>
> The gconf-schemas script appeared in 2.10.1-2 in Debian. However it
> appeared in a later version in Ubuntu. Thus, the upgrade proceeds with
> the gconf2 from Breezy which p
This was originally on debian-legal, but it was suggested to ask here
before mass-filing bug reports. Opinions? Should we file bugs for
this? What severity?
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think you should file bug reports, but I think you should ask a
> wider or higher audience (maybe
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 15:05]:
> Andreas, do you have an explanation of why d-i commit access was taken from
> me, and why i find out only now as i was going to fix the issue ?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/03/msg01075.html sounds like
you stepped back, and
http://lis
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:52:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 15:05]:
> > Andreas, do you have an explanation of why d-i commit access was taken from
> > me, and why i find out only now as i was going to fix the issue ?
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debia
Hi,
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:52:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 15:05]:
> > > Andreas, do you have an explanation of why d-i commit access was taken
> > > from
> > > me, and why i find out only now as i was going to fix the iss
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:10:17PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:52:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 15:05]:
> > > > Andreas, do you have an explanation of why d-i commit access was taken
>
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:10:17PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:52:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 15:05]:
> > > > > Andreas, do you have an explanation of why
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:32:42PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 05:10:17PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:52:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > > > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PR
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 11:43:02AM -0400, Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr]
wrote:
> Just what are the rules for someone to have commit access?
None, it is the full decision of the project admin, and i believe what
happened here is that one such project admin did let some petty personal
consider
On 4/27/06, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 11:43:02AM -0400, Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr]
> wrote:
> > Just what are the rules for someone to have commit access?
>
> None, it is the full decision of the project admin, and i believe what
> happened here is th
Hi again,
On 10/29/05, Olaf van der Spek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Does anyone know the Apache2 maintenance status?
> Lots of bug reports appear to be 'ignored'.
>
> Examples are:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=267477
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bu
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:43:47AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> That's because sometimes it takes that long to find out whether the
> failure is really the maintainer's problem rather than the buildd
> admin's.
Ok, so it is not true that they can be distinguished automatically from
failures whi
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 07:09:17AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> Turning shadow on in chroots is left up to the local admin.
>
> This is optionnally done by the passwd package when it is
> reconfigured, see /var/lib/dpkg/info/passwd.config
>
> Of course, using "shadowconfig on" is also pos
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I stepped back from d-i powerpc port maintainer, not as d-i
contributor.
>
> > >
> > > So there apparently was a misunderstanding.
> [...]
> > who was kicked out you mea
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 11:43:02AM -0400, Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr]
wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> > > > >
> > > > > I stepped back from d-i powerpc port maintainer, not as d-i
> contributor.
> >
> >
Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr] wrote:
> I don't think you understand. There was not a peep on the list about
> anything being up with the daily image until Sven explicitely stated it.
All of us who read http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/build-logs.html
on a daily basis knew that the powerpc
(dropping the ridiculous CC list, AFAICT everybody is subscribed)
On Thursday 27 April 2006 17:47, Sven Luther wrote:
> None, it is the full decision of the project admin, and i believe what
> happened here is that one such project admin did let some petty
> personal considerations overstep his re
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 06:46:11PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> (dropping the ridiculous CC list, AFAICT everybody is subscribed)
>
> On Thursday 27 April 2006 17:47, Sven Luther wrote:
> > None, it is the full decision of the project admin, and i believe what
> > happened here is that one such proje
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 07:10:08PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 06:46:11PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
> > (dropping the ridiculous CC list, AFAICT everybody is subscribed)
> >
> > On Thursday 27 April 2006 17:47, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > None, it is the full decision of the pro
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 12:36:56PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford [Contr] wrote:
> > I don't think you understand. There was not a peep on the list about
> > anything being up with the daily image until Sven explicitely stated it.
>
> All of us who read http://people.debian.
* Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 17:03]:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:52:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 15:05]:
> > > Andreas, do you have an explanation of why d-i commit access was taken
> > > from
> > > me, and why i find out only now as
* Olaf van der Spek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 17:54]:
> On 4/27/06, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 11:43:02AM -0400, Toni L. Harbaugh-Blackford
> > [Contr] wrote:
> > > Just what are the rules for someone to have commit access?
> >
> > None, it is the full dec
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 18:38]:
> c) The mipsel builds had been down nearly as long. And that machine
>seems to be dead. Argh.
Would you need access to another mipsel machine?
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: debcheck
Version : as of 2006/3/19
Upstream Author : Jerome Vouillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~vouillon/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Obj
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:47:33PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 17:03]:
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:52:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > * Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060427 15:05]:
> > > > Andreas, do you have an explanation of why d-i commit
On Thursday 27 April 2006 08:19, Mike Hommey wrote:
> When will you learn you don't have to reply to every single message in a
> thread ? Frank's and my message were the exact same. Why do you feel you
> have to answer twice to the same thing ?
>
> And please stop this "Friendly" signature, it's pa
On 4/27/06, Gonéri Le Bouder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 27 April 2006 01:13, Andrew Donnellan wrote:
> > On 4/27/06, Gonéri Le Bouder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > On graphic software websites, in general the most visited page is the one
> > > with the screenshot
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:53:20PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * Package name: debcheck
> Version : as of 2006/3/19
> Upstream Author : Jerome Vouillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http:/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: indi
Version : 0.3
Upstream Author : Jasem Mutlaq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Elwood C. Downey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://indi.sourceforge.net
* License
This one time, at band camp, Sven Luther said:
> you kicked me out [...]
> just to get ride of me [...]
> it was more important to get ride of sven [...]
> that you kicked the powerpc maintainer out of the project [...]
> uther contempt for all the work i did do in the past for this [...]
> you exp
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:46:24PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> The maintainer is held responsible (and frans and joeyh have not stepped down
> from reminding me of this in the past) of the build failure, while a
> contributor is free commit fixes, without necessarily being the one to blame
> for ev
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 03:34:30PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:46:24PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > The maintainer is held responsible (and frans and joeyh have not stepped
> > down
> > from reminding me of this in the past) of the build failure, while a
> > contribu
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 12:44:13AM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:46:24PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > Well, it is what i see. There is nothing to clarify on this
> > point. They removed me to get ride of me, and despite Colin's help,
> > they don't really have som
On Thursday 27 April 2006 17:49, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Nobody loves me, everybody hates me, I think I'll just eat worms.
>
> Lighten up, dude. Better yet, find professional help.
From the outside it seems to me that his complaints are with merit. And this
is a meritocracy; not a democracy.
pgp
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 11:49:08PM +0100, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Sven Luther said:
> > you kicked me out [...]
> > just to get ride of me [...]
> > it was more important to get ride of sven [...]
> > that you kicked the powerpc maintainer out of the project [...]
> > uth
This one time, at band camp, Jason D. Clinton said:
> On Thursday 27 April 2006 17:49, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > Nobody loves me, everybody hates me, I think I'll just eat worms.
> >
> > Lighten up, dude. Better yet, find professional help.
>
> From the outside it seems to me that his complaints ar
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 10:46:24PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Well, it is what i see. There is nothing to clarify on this
> point. They removed me to get ride of me, and despite Colin's help,
> they don't really have someone to make the real work.
So Colin's help isn't real, or what?
Please don
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's the rest of my original e-mail:
> I just noticed that heimdal-docs contained copies of RFCs, which I
> believe are licensed under a non-free license, so I filed bug #364860.
> Then I looked at what other packages in testing may have the same
>
The next Debian Installer team opened meeting is still scheduled for
Saturday Apr 29th 16:00 UTC, that is in about 35 hours.
This meeting will be focused on the beta3 release preparation and the
first sarge installer release update..
The Wiki page is still opened for the meeting agenda.
http://
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 01:00:16AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Seriously, in what did this mail help ? Do you feel better now ? Was it in any
> way constructive ? In what do you believe you are better than me over this ?
Apply these same two lines to all of *your* posts to this thread (in the past
The following is a listing of packages for which help has been requested
through the WNPP (Work-Needing and Prospective Packages) system in the
last week.
Total number of orphaned packages: 297 (new: 8)
Total number of packages offered up for adoption: 86 (new: 4)
Total number of packages requeste
67 matches
Mail list logo
