On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:53:20PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Ralf Treinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Package name : debcheck > Version : as of 2006/3/19 > Upstream Author : Jerome Vouillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~vouillon/ > * License : GPL > Programming Lang: Objective Caml > Description : Checks whether dependencies of debian packages can be > satisfied > > This software checks for every package of a distribution (in the > debian format .deb) whether it is possible to satisfy its dependencies > and conflicts within this distribution.
Looking at the docs the tool seems to be able to work on any set of debian packages provided as Packages entries provided on standard input. I would thus rephrase the above paragraph as: This software checks for a set of Debian packages (provided as Packages entries) whether it is possible to satisfy the dependencies and conflicts of all involved packages within the set. Better to ask for an advice of a native English speaker, but my point is to emphasize "the set of packages" rather then "the distribution". > Preliminary packages are available at > http://people.debian.org/~treinen/debcheck/ I suggest to add to the manpage an hint that the Packages file is a suitable input for the tool. I saw that there is also an rpmcheck tool, which does the same for .rpm packages. Don't you plan to package this as well? What about providing an unique binary package (maybe called "pkgcheck") with the two binaries? If you are worried about the size: upstream links them separately and they are 130 Kb each, but I'm pretty confident that linking a single executable with two different names and the usual speculation about Sys.argv.(0) would dramatically cut down the total size ... Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
