On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:18:00AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 10469 March 1977, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > I can't see the rationale for rejecting source uploads, and they used to
> > be accepted in the past.
>
> Because people then fuck up their packages even more.
>
> No, they havent bee
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
>> Because it isn't true that the previous version didn't use debconf. It
>> just asked the questions totally differently and took an approach that I
>> now would call flawed. But still it gave the users the impression that
>> their ls-R
It's not all that unusual for conferences to require that the material
submitted for the conference be licensed in a specific manner; if you
plan on presenting, some DFSG free license of the material you present
should be expected so portions of the work can be utilized in main or
otherwise distrib
[Chip Salzenberg]
> I see no point in trying to force my way (back) into a project that
> shows no interest in allowing me to keep participating. Therefore,
> I hereby resign from the Debian Project.
Please, do not do this. "The project" is to large and fuzzy to have
any interest, but there are
also sprach Piotr Roszatycki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.11.10.1908 +0100]:
> CVSsuck is a mirroring tool for CVS repositories. Unlike other
> tools such as CVSup or rsync, it uses cvs command to access the
> repository. So, it works well with remote repositories without
> a special server or shell a
On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Nicolas Fran?ois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In #276419, the bug submitter complained that when a command and some
> arguments were passed to su, all these arguments were concatenated, and
> provided to the shell -c option.
>
> This behavior differs from su on other
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 14:51:30 +1000
Anthony Towns wrote:
> Anyway, if it's recompressing like I think, there's no way to get the
> same compressed md5sum -- even if the information could be
> transferred, there's no guarantee the local gzip _can_ produce the
> same output as the remote gzip -- ima
Le vendredi 11 novembre 2005 à 00:55 +0100, Bernd Eckenfels a écrit :
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Why is this the case ? I'm running with experimental GNOME packages; if
> > I upload a binary package depending on them, it will be uninstallable on
> > unstable systems.
>
> How c
On 11/10/05, Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [Josselin Mouette]
> > I can't see the rationale for rejecting source uploads, and they used
> > to be accepted in the past.
>
> It's the first line of defense against people uploading things that
> don't build, wasting various infrastruct
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 04:22:39PM -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > There are around 1000 developers out there. At the very least I am
> > sure you would find several of them willing to sponsor your upload.
>
> That's not a fix, it's a bad workaround.
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Whatever you choose to do, you need to take care of partial upgrade.
Not across released stable versions! Since when do we support
stable/stable+1 mixed systems?
Besides, depends/pre-depends and conflicts should be more than enough if
done right. New
[Brian Nelson]
> Oh, so Ubuntu packages are fucked up more by their maintainers more
> than Debian packages are?
Yes, or so it's been alleged.
Not being a user of ubuntu unstable, I can't confirm or deny.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 09:54:09AM -0500, Michael Vogt wrote:
> > A problem is that zsync needs to teached to deal with deb files (that
> > is, that it needs to unpack the data.tar and use that for the syncs).
[Anthony Towns]
> That seems kinda awkward -- you'd need to start by downloading the
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:26:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Why fight at all? If having a free license is so obviously correct, why
> force people to do it? If some people are uncomfortable with it, why
> fight that?
Even within Debian, it's become clear to me that, if we want DFSG-free
thing
Hi,
> > > We would now like to get rid of this bug. What do you recommend:
> > > * keep a Debian specific implementation and tag this bug wontfix
> > > * reapply the patch to fix this bug, and report bugs on the packages that
> > >uses this "feature"
> >
> > Could you document and wait unti
> The ideal way to approach this is to announce a change,
Which is what we are doing now. We neglected to do so the first time
(mostly because we didn't anticipate this would break pbuilder so
much) and this is why we reverted the change very quickly.
> document that change, provide some envir
I never got an answer, and when upstream was presented with the problem
OpenSCEP more or less died. Go figure. I lost interest in the packageing
due to this.
> Lars, If you ever got an answer to your question below could you
> share it with me. I'm trying to compile a mixed fortran C code that
Op do, 10-11-2005 te 16:22 -0800, schreef Chip Salzenberg:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > There are around 1000 developers out there. At the very least I am
> > sure you would find several of them willing to sponsor your upload.
>
> That's not a fix, it's a bad workaround.
Yes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am looking for the sheet music to the song due1ing b4nj0s from the
> movie deliverance. It's for guitar. Can you tell me where I can
> find it?
Please see (for instance)
http://www.cowboylyrics.com/tabs/flatt-and-scruggs/due%6cing-b%61nj%6fs-6185.html
http://www.sh
Hi,
I tried to download and run Live CD but without
success. I think that collaboration of enterprise forces of
Solaris-security,stable,expandable and usability of Debian platform is
great idea. I'm a sys admin in Institute of Computer and Comm. Systems - Bulg.
Academy of Science. Our effort
Hi,
> > support for that change (like POSIXLY_CORRECT)
> >
> > Then change.
> >
> > We've got quite a bit of tools in sarge that doesn't work with
> > this change, right?
>
>
> >From what Nicolas investigated, not that much. He only found dchroot
> and pbuilder up to now. Nicolas does not pret
Hi,
It seems that not every new maintainer is building a package
on an unstable system which is recommended (or at least a
version with the current policy version).
So there are errors in packages which come to debian-mentors
which are checked with an old version of the debian policy.
So what a
Re: Nico Golde in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> So what about a special exception which provides updated
> lintian & linda packages for the stable distribution?
> Is it technical possible? I mean becaused it should be
> fixed.
This doesn't make sense. You need unstable to build on unstable, and
only upd
Hi,
> > CVSsuck is a mirroring tool for CVS repositories. Unlike other
> > tools such as CVSup or rsync, it uses cvs command to access the
> > repository. So, it works well with remote repositories without
> > a special server or shell account. However it is inefficient and
> > not perfect because
> FWIW, pbuilder in sid is fixed since 0.129 (17 August 2005),
> and I am hoping that will
> probagate into some stable backports, so that practically,
> pbuilder side is ready for the new su.
Well, this is actually great news as pbuilder was by far the main
blocker for this change. Sorry for ha
Hi,
> Today I did a update of the system (yes, sid and yes I know it can be
> unstable but...) and the update includes grep where no open critical bug
> was seen. After Boot the system was completely broken as of the libpcre
> dependency.
>
> So please do not close bugs bevore it is available on
Anthony:
Anthony Towns wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 11:56:32PM -0600, Bill Gatliff wrote:
And, I mean, seriously: using the threat of legal action to make people
remove free software from the Internet? Whose side are we on here?
No. The threat of legal action to stop the theft of
On Friday 11 November 2005 06:48, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 06:07:33PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
> > > [0] Presuming the FSF's claims about dynamic linking hold up in this
> > > case, anyway.
> >
> > I consider a Debian-derived distribution a derived work of the contained
> e.g. you cannot fix Sarge pbuilder anyway, so etch su must work with sarge
> pbuilder. That why it would have been better to announce the change before
> Sarge release.
Maybe, but unfortunately, this bug was properly analysed a few weeks
*after* sarge release. Remember, there were over 150 ope
Bill Gatliff writes:
> With all due respect, and a certain unwillingness to get distracted
> from the main thread of discussion or to further inflame an already
> pretty volatile situation, I think that "theft" may in fact be the
> appropriate term to use here.
Theft, n.:
1. (Law) The act of
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:28:31PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> So what about a special exception which provides updated lintian &
> linda packages for the stable distribution? Is it technical possible?
> I mean becaused it should be fixed.
It might not be necessary as an exception: perhaps the rul
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 02:16:39PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > And while dash is also optional, all *correctly* written /bin/sh
> > scripts should work with dash too.
>
> That's incorrect. A correctly written /bin/sh script is allowed to
> Oh, and here's something else to ponder: Maybe, just maybe, James has
> more time to go to Ubuntu below zero than he has to handle keyring
> updates because he prioritizes by what gets the bills paid. As most of
> us do, I suppose.
Yep, this is something I was about to add.
Most of us have mo
Bill Gatliff writes:
> Taking something you're not entitled to ~= theft.
Nothing is being taken. A copyright may be being infringed, but the owner
is not being deprived of any property.
> Whether Erast did so with malicious intent, that's another question
> entirely.
It is not. Theft requires
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: kde-style-polymer
Version : 0.5.5
Upstream Author : Marco Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.kde-look.org/content/show.php?content=27968
* License : GPL
Descri
Hi!
* Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05 15:28]:
> So what about a special exception which provides updated
> lintian & linda packages for the stable distribution?
> Is it technical possible? I mean becaused it should be
> fixed.
Curently it's quite easy to run unstables lintian, debootstr
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:11:24AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Bill Gatliff writes:
> > Taking something you're not entitled to ~= theft.
>
> Nothing is being taken. A copyright may be being infringed, but the owner
> is not being deprived of any property.
There's something darkly amusing about
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Esteban Manchado Velázquez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libcommandline-ruby
Version : 0.7.10
Upstream Author : Jim Freeze
* URL : http://rubyforge.org/projects/optionparser/
* License : BSD-style
Description
Op vr, 11-11-2005 te 15:28 +0100, schreef Nico Golde:
> So what about a special exception which provides updated
> lintian & linda packages for the stable distribution?
Doesn't sound like a particularly good idea to me. You need no just
unstable's linda/lintian; you also need unstable's libraries
Glenn:
Glenn Maynard wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:11:24AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
Bill Gatliff writes:
Taking something you're not entitled to ~= theft.
Nothing is being taken. A copyright may be being infringed, but the owner
is not being deprived of any property.
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:09:22PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op do, 10-11-2005 te 16:22 -0800, schreef Chip Salzenberg:
> > Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > There are around 1000 developers out there. At the very least I am
> > > sure you would find several of them willing to
Klaus Ethgen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today I did a update of the system (yes, sid and yes I know it can be
> unstable but...) and the update includes grep where no open critical bug
> was seen. After Boot the system was completely broken as of the libpcre
> dependency.
> So please do not clos
[Wouter Verhelst]
> Oh, and here's something else to ponder: Maybe, just maybe, James
> has more time to go to Ubuntu below zero than he has to handle
> keyring updates because he prioritizes by what gets the bills
> paid. As most of us do, I suppose.
Yes, most of us have changing priorities, and
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 12:10:06 -0600, Bill Gatliff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
[...]
> No, the owner hasn't been deprived. But the rights said owner
> conveyed via the GPL (which amount to some level of ownership, at
> least philosophically) have been deprived from the GNU/Solaris end
> users. It's
Hi,
while my regular "clean up RC-bugs"-work I noticed that the package krb4
is RC-buggy in more than one way. On further investigation, I also
noticed that kerberos 4 is dying right now, and also that the bugs are
not as easy to fix. Also, upstream doesn't look too active according to
http://www.
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 15:23 -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> Over the past five weeks
And guess how long will take to get your account removed.
--
David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: C671257D
Este no es un capr
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, David Weinehall wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 02:16:39PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> > David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > And while dash is also optional, all *correctly* written /bin/sh
> > > scripts should work with dash too.
> >
> > That's inco
What is happening with testing migration of my package, sork-passwd?
The various "testing migration" pages seem to be all confused:
- http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?package=sork-passwd doesn't give
me the "excuses" link anymore
- http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=sork-passwd th
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 00:53, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 02:50:01PM -0800, Alex Ross wrote:
> > Here's the 2nd part of the answer:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > The question is, are you going to pursue a legal action against Sun
> > > Microsystems?
>
> To which m
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, my question is simple: should I push packages to go away from
> kerberos-4-support? Unless there is a good reason to do not, I would
> start to push into that direction. And of course, feel free to send me
> things that need to be changed. As usual
> "Andreas" == Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andreas> Hi, while my regular "clean up RC-bugs"-work I noticed
Andreas> that the package krb4 is RC-buggy in more than one
Andreas> way. On further investigation, I also noticed that
Andreas> kerberos 4 is dying right no
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: borg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: Buoh
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author :
* URL : http://buoh.steve-o.org/
* License : GPL
Description : Buoh is a reader for online strips comics, designed to work
well under t
Suppose you have a repository stuffed full of binary packages, in this
case Debian Packages. If you were unlucky enough to have them in a
rather un-organized fashion, I was just wondering if the package file
itself would provide said information to allow me to write a program to
sort them out.
Hi,
Christopher Crammond Christopher Crammond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Suppose you have a repository stuffed full of binary packages, in
> this case Debian Packages. If you were unlucky enough to have them
> in a rather un-organized fashion, I was just wondering if the package
> file itself would p
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:28:31PM +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
[...]
> So what about a special exception which provides updated
> lintian & linda packages for the stable distribution?
> Is it technical possible? I mean becaused it should be
> fixed.
That's imho wrong idea because of at least one
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 05:18:09PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 01:40:27PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 02:53:01PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 08:55:41PM -0600, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > > > many of Erast's res
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Find out what is required to keep AFS support working (assuming I
> don't already have it).
Well, what sort of AFS environment? The answer is different if you mean
"AFS using kaserver" than if you mean "AFS using krb524 or native K5."
--
Russ Allbery
* Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [05 21:47]:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Well, my question is simple: should I push packages to go away from
> > kerberos-4-support? Unless there is a good reason to do not, I would
> > start to push into that direction. And of course, feel
El jue, 10-11-2005 a las 23:43 +0100, Josselin Mouette escribió:
> Le jeudi 10 novembre 2005 à 23:00 +0100, Adeodato Simó a écrit :
> > * Josselin Mouette [Thu, 10 Nov 2005 22:45:20 +0100]:
> >
> > > (And don't tell me to use pbuilder, I don't have the disk space nor the
> > > bandwidth for it.)
>
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You think that December 2006 (the expected release time of etch) is too
> early to drop Kerberos 4?
I'm not sure. I think it's going to be tight for some people, but on the
other hand not shipping etch with MIT Kerberos 1.5 is not exactly
appealing. I
* Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [05 23:26]:
> Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > You think that December 2006 (the expected release time of etch) is too
> > early to drop Kerberos 4?
> I'm not sure. I think it's going to be tight for some people, but on the
> other hand not s
Hi,
* Wouter Verhelst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-11 23:41]:
> Op vr, 11-11-2005 te 15:28 +0100, schreef Nico Golde:
> > So what about a special exception which provides updated
> > lintian & linda packages for the stable distribution?
>
> Doesn't sound like a particularly good idea to me. You n
On Friday 11 November 2005 21:19, George Danchev wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 November 2005 00:53, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 02:50:01PM -0800, Alex Ross wrote:
> > > Here's the 2nd part of the answer:
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > The question is, are you going to
"David Moreno Garza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 15:23 -0800, Chip Salzenberg wrote:
Over the past five weeks
And guess how long will take to get your account removed.
Hmm... Doesn't a resignation require a message signed with a key on the
On Friday 11 November 2005 19:36, Erast Benson wrote:
> > On Friday 11 November 2005 06:48, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Let's consider this dpkg binary from the GNU/Solaris LiveCD, which I have
> > loop
> > mounted:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/gnusolaris/livecd-mnt/usr/bin$ ./dpkg
> > bash: ./dpkg: No
> "Peter" == Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> [Miles Bader]
>> I'd say so. Or fix the bug.
Peter> Kind of quick and dirty, and not particularly tested, since
Peter> I don't actually know how to use ttysnoop.
Peter> But it's a proof of concept of how eas
> "Junichi" == Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Junichi> Hi,
>> Today I did a update of the system (yes, sid and yes I know it
>> can be unstable but...) and the update includes grep where no
>> open critical bug was seen. After Boot the system was
>> completely b
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 11:19:07PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [05 21:47]:
> > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Well, my question is simple: should I push packages to go away from
> > > kerberos-4-support? Unless there is a good reason to do n
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:26:58 +1000 Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 07:49:36PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> > FYI, a possible response might be: "we care about freeness, but we
> > pick our battle, and our battle is Debian main". I care about
> > starving children, but I don't dona
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 08:58:35PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> What is happening with testing migration of my package, sork-passwd?
> The various "testing migration" pages seem to be all confused:
> - http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?package=sork-passwd doesn't give
> me the "excuses" l
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Steffen Joeris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: italc
Version : 0.9.6.2
Upstream Author : Tobias Doerffel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://italc.sourceforge.net/download.php
* License : GPL
Description : teachin
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-turbogears
Version : 0.8a3
Upstream Author : Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.turbogears.org/
* License : http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-li
Hello folks,
I prepared a new package of grub for upload in next days. It still
needs some work but looks like a good improvement.
Would be good if you could do a brief test of it and provide feedback
directly to me. If it solve any previous bug that you had before,
would be good if you could se
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 11:43:23AM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 10:11:24AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> > Bill Gatliff writes:
> > > Taking something you're not entitled to ~= theft.
> > Nothing is being taken. A copyright may be being infringed, but the owner
> > is not be
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:49:21AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> It's not all that unusual for conferences to require that the material
> submitted for the conference be licensed in a specific manner;
OTOH, conferences usually ask for the minimal permission they actually
need to do their job.
>
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 08:00:55AM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:26:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Why fight at all? If having a free license is so obviously correct, why
> > force people to do it? If some people are uncomfortable with it, why
> > fight that?
> Even
Hi,
> >> Today I did a update of the system (yes, sid and yes I know it
> >> can be unstable but...) and the update includes grep where no
> >> open critical bug was seen. After Boot the system was
> >> completely broken as of the libpcre dependency.
> >>
> >> So please do
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 08:58:35PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> What is happening with testing migration of my package, sork-passwd?
sork-passwd |2.2.2-2 | testing | source, all
sork-passwd |2.2.2-2 | unstable | source, all
It migrated already...
Cheers,
aj
signature.
Scribit Josselin Mouette dies 10/11/2005 hora 22:45:
> Le jeudi 10 novembre 2005 à 13:32 -0800, Debian Installer a écrit :
> > Rejected: source only uploads are not supported.
> I can't see the rationale for rejecting source uploads, and they used
> to be accepted in the past.
And I see a rational
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:49:21AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > It's not all that unusual for conferences to require that the material
> > submitted for the conference be licensed in a specific manner;
>
> OTOH, conferences usually ask for the minima
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 07:36:46AM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> > "Andreas" == Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andreas> Hi, while my regular "clean up RC-bugs"-work I noticed
> Andreas> that the package krb4 is RC-buggy in more than one
> Andreas> way. On further investiga
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 10:46:24AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Of course, within Debian DFSG-freeness isn't mandatory or enforced: you
> can upload to non-free instead of main just by tweaking your control file.
The response is predictable, but here it is anyway: non-free isn't within
Debian; De
Scribit Anthony Towns dies 11/11/2005 hora 16:43:
> The problem is a technicality, not a moral or practical difference
> from the GPL's expectations: you still have the source to OpenSolaris
> libc, and you still have permission to modify it, redistribute it,
> sell it, etc.
Didn't someone ask for
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:48:20 +1000, Anthony Towns
said:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 06:07:33PM +0100, David Schmitt wrote:
>> > [0] Presuming the FSF's claims about dynamic linking hold up in
>> > this
>> > case, anyway.
>> I consider a Debian-derived distribution a derived work of the
>> con
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:26:52 +1000, Anthony Towns
said:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:49:21AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> [If this poses a problem,[1] you always have the option of not
>> presenting, or presenting your work in an informal session.]
> *sigh*
> Does this really have to devolv
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:26:58 +1000, Anthony Towns
said:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 07:49:36PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>> FYI, a possible response might be: "we care about freeness, but we
>> pick our battle, and our battle is Debian main". I care about
>> starving children, but I don't dona
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 02:29:56 +0100, Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Scribit Josselin Mouette dies 10/11/2005 hora 22:45:
>> Le jeudi 10 novembre 2005 à 13:32 -0800, Debian Installer a écrit :
>> > Rejected: source only uploads are not supported.
>> I can't see the rationale for rejecti
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:46:24 +1000, Anthony Towns
said:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 08:00:55AM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:26:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> > Why fight at all? If having a free license is so obviously
>> > correct, why force people to do it? If
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-pyprotocols
Version : 0.9.3
Upstream Author : Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com>
* URL : http://peak.telecommunity.com/PyProtocols.html
* License : http://www.zope
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-ruledispatch
Version : 0.5a0dev
Upstream Author : Phillip J. Eby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
http://www.turbogears.org/download/eggs/RuleDispatch-0.5a0dev_r2097.zip
* License
Dear Sir
We are Exporter of all kind of
Textile Waste from Pakistan and
would like to extend our Business Relationship with your esteem Company, we can
provide you following item
Gin mote
Card Fly
Cotton Yarn Waste
P/C Yarn Waste
Comber Noël
Hosiery Cutting 100% Cotton
Hosiery Cotto
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: python-testgears
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : Kevin Dangoor
* URL : http://www.turbogears.org/testgears/
* License : http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php
92 matches
Mail list logo
