* Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [051111 21:47]: > Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Well, my question is simple: should I push packages to go away from > > kerberos-4-support? Unless there is a good reason to do not, I would > > start to push into that direction. And of course, feel free to send me > > things that need to be changed. As usual, the maintainers have a special > > say in everything (that's why I Cced them). :)
> I think it's time to encourage maintainers to start thinking about this, > as the next major release of MIT Kerberos is also going to drop Kerberos > v4 support as of May of 2006. Kerberos 4 support will still be there in > the MIT package until at least that time, and there are some sites who are > still in the process of transitioning away, so I wouldn't want to see too > many things disappear too quickly, but it's certainly time to think about > how to drop it over time. You think that December 2006 (the expected release time of etch) is too early to drop Kerberos 4? Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
