Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It would surely be nice to see performance numbers from actual
> applications. After all, the applications are normally doing
> some things besides low level atomic operations.
Indeed, it would be interesting to find out how often applications
invoke th
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 02:08:33PM -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
> Woody was effectively frozen around Jan 2002, no major changes to
> packages were permitted, etc.
I'm sorry, but you're still wrong. No major changes to subsystems were
allowed -- like switching to KDE 3, or new Qt, or new Gnome, or
A fixed libstdc++ package (0pre7) has been uploaded to incoming. You
can get it from
http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/gcc-3.3/
for i386 as well. Another workaround is to keep or reinstall the 0pre5
package (it's currently in sarge/testing).
Sorry for messing up unstable, I did the test
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 05:15:44PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> The festival speech syntesizer needs at least one voice file. I'd like to
> use a virtual package named "festival-voice" so that people cannot install
> it without one, which is a problem (see the above bug).
Last time I looked, t
Whether we end up with "/run/, resolvconf and read-only root"
depends a lot on whether the maintainers of the affected packages
support the project. So far the response has not been positive.
Here is a quick summary for the packages that were on my TODO list.
Creating /run/
base-files Chang
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 11:43:38PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Try running apt in an up-to-date unstable. (this isn't apt's fault,
> of course)
Ah, yeah, I downgraded and put libstdc++5 on hold the second shit
started flowing downhill (ie with menu) :)
Regards
Josh
--
New PGP public key:
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Btw, looking at the reports, I see 30 submitted from i386 architectures,
> one from a powerpc machine, none from other architectures, although all
> architectures are affected. Conclusions? ;-)
The general i386-user is so stupid that they can't handle
* Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-04-30 17:26]:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 05:15:44PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> > The festival speech syntesizer needs at least one voice file. I'd like to
> > use a virtual package named "festival-voice" so that people cannot install
> > it without on
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Backporting]
>> Is it as simple as using something like pbuilder and tweaking the
>> Build-Depends to match the versions of the packages that are in stable?
> To answer the question, the answer is 'no, not always'.
> You need some try-and-error, and usu
Hi,
(sorry to respond)
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 07:35:47PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-04-29 at 14:32, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:24:19 -0400, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > To be precise, you said "Maybe novices should only be shown
> >
En réponse à Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Btw, looking at the reports, I see 30 submitted from i386
> architectures,
> one from a powerpc machine, none from other architectures, although
> all
> architectures are affected. Conclusions? ;-)
Let's drop the others? };->
--
Jérôme Marant <[
Hi,
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 07:26:11 +, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 05:15:44PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>> The festival speech syntesizer needs at least one voice file. I'd like
>> to use a virtual package named "festival-voice" so that people cannot
>> install it without
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Apr 2003 04:16:42 +, Matthew Palmer wrote:
>> Policy requires discussing new virtual packages on d-d...
>
> Unless the virtual package is only to be used amongst a group of
> cooperating packages (Policy section 2.3.5). I think this would
> qualify.
>
I don't know whether the
On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 12:52:11PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-04-26 at 03:56, Chris Cheney wrote:
>
> > I also find it hard to believe that the majority of our users do not
> > have or can not purchase a system that is less than 7 years old.
>
> I have a brand new 486-class s
Title: SinPublicidad.com -- Con su permiso
Le pedimos permiso para ofrecerle información puntual
Para verla en modo web pulse
aquí
Para recibir un mensaje envíenos un e-mail haciendo
click aquí
¡Solicítenos
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 12:45:32PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>
> Nope. We need ourselves to play with unstable - but unstable is not up
> for testing. That's what *testing* is for! :-)
>
> Ideally, Sid should stay as a developer testbed. In fact, when I started
> using it, I got disappointed beca
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 09:23:39AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Btw, looking at the reports, I see 30 submitted from i386 architectures,
> one from a powerpc machine, none from other architectures, although all
> architectures are affected. Conclusions? ;-)
Users of non-i386 architectures are g
$BF|K\0l$N=P2q$$7O%5%$%H$KL\;X$9!*(B
$B$?$@:#2q0wEPO?$O(B60$B?M0J>e!"F|(B9000$B?MA}0wCf(B
$B%a%k%H%b!*%d%j%H%b!*(B
$BI,$:=P2q$($k(B
$BKM$i$N;dC#$N!*"v#L#O#V#E"v(B
$B"-"-(BAINO.COM $B"-"-(B
(Bhttp://divide.jp/ai/
$B7HBS$+$i%"%/%;%9$b$G$-$^$9$h!*(B
(B
$B
Hello,
I am packaging relay-ctrl package which is tool how to make pop3be4smtp for
qmail based systems.
Versions before 2.53 worked by compiling tcp.smtp.cdb database each time
new IP was authorized and no modification of smtp service was neccessary.
>From version 3.0 you need to modify all ser
Hi,
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:22:33 +, Jesus Climent wrote:
> I had the idea that stopping the upgrades, rebuilding *all* the packages
> with the new version of the compilers and reinitiating the upgrades
> could solve the problem which otherwise has caused a great deal of
> delay.
If I understo
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Btw, looking at the reports, I see 30 submitted from i386 architectures,
> one from a powerpc machine, none from other architectures, although all
> architectures are affected. Conclusions? ;-)
Well, duh, let's see. Several architectures' build were e
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> If I understood correctly, part of the problem is/was that some of the
> rebuilds simply didn't work because of problems with the new compilers.
>
> The current tools don't allow programs of arch X into testing if they fail to
> build on arch Y. I think that in general th
Hi,
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:38:30 +, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> people tend to have a lot larger memory for words than for images and
> unpronounceable hieroglyphs (icons, and -- shudder -- tool bars).
Not to nitpick, but people, and indeed entire cultures, for which this
isn't true -- because
Missing X-Debbugs-CC?
- Forwarded message from Rick Younie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Rick Younie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:00:39 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RFA: sbuild -- Tool for building Debian binary packages from Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I don't know what it will take to convince you, but I would like you to
> answer these questions:
I also have a problem with adding another toplevel directory and I suspect
there are some more. I haven't read the complete thread (I also have other
On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 04:08:14AM -0700, David Nusinow wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 06:13:38AM +0200, Alexander Wirt wrote:
> > i have written a small wrapper for apt-get that makes it possible to
> > install all recommended and/or suggested Packages for a Package too.
> Why not just use apt
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 02:27:35PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:38:30 +, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> > people tend to have a lot larger memory for words than for images and
> > unpronounceable hieroglyphs (icons, and -- shudder -- tool bars).
>
> Not to nitpic
Why is OpenOffice in the "Other" menu in Gnome (2.2) instead of in the
"Office" menu where it should be?
--
.''`. Carl B. Constantine
: :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`. `'GnuPG: 135F FC30 7A02 B0EB 61DB 34E3 3AF1 DC6C 9F7A 3FF8
`- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom
pgpsaCwuci3o
* Anthony DeRobertis
| On Sat, 2003-04-26 at 03:56, Chris Cheney wrote:
|
| > I also find it hard to believe that the majority of our users do not
| > have or can not purchase a system that is less than 7 years old.
|
| I have a brand new 486-class system with 32MB of RAM. It's less than 6
| mo
On 29-Apr-03, 19:11 (CDT), James D Strandboge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are going to backport packages from sid, you will most likely
> need to backport debhelper, debconf, automake*, et al so that the
> package will build properly (though it may *compile* correctly).
Instead of backpor
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> Maybe that's intuitive to some people but to me it just looks wierd. On the
> other hand if it simply had the letters "bash" or just "sh" it's meaning
> would have been immediatly apparent.
Indeed. There's a Windows tool I use at times, called
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-30
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: gnome-velocity
Version : 0.1alpha
Upstream Author : Kyle Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://velocity.sf.net
* License : GPL
Description : A light file manager
浪潮：国内专业的电子邮件营销网，7600万国内综合电子邮件地址+3200万国内分行业、分服务器、分地区邮件地址+1700万分国家邮件地址+118
种网络营销邮件群发工具（都已经注册）+22.7万大型企业领导人联系地址email地址=160元（原价300），！7600万国内综合电子邮件地址+118种
网络营销邮件群发工具（都已经注册）=80元。全球震撼价，如发现比本站价格更低的，敬请回电，本站将免费赠送上诉资源!
我们的口号：让全球每个人都能聆听到您的讯息!
浪潮网络营销工作室(亿虎系列软件华东代理商）
http://langchao.3322.net
http://langchao.789
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 03:13:43PM +0200, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> > Do you think having programs write to /etc is a bad thing?
> I think creating /run is worse.
> I think it should be possible for any program that writes to /etc (it it
> cannot use /var) either to be configurable to store it's d
Hi,
On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:06:11 +, Björn Stenberg wrote:
> Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>> The current tools don't allow programs of arch X into testing if they
>> fail to build on arch Y. I think that in general this is a good idea.
>
> I disagree. The net effect is that the program gets less te
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 30 April 2003 16:29, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Anthony DeRobertis
> | Please explain how I can get a similar system, running on a similar
> | amount of power, and with no moving parts (i.e., no fans) using, even a
> | P-II.
>
> http://www
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
>
> > > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-linux/3.2.3/../../../libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined
> > > reference to `Xine
> > > ramaIsActive'
> > > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/m68k-linux/3.2.3/../../../libgdk-x11-2.0.so: undefined
> > > reference to `Xine
> > > ramaQueryScreens'
> > > collect2: ld
severity #191420 wishlist
thanks
I don't know why it was filled as Normal... it didn't recognize
"wishlist" as a valid value for the Severity pseudo-header...
Any hints?
Cheers
PS.: CC me, I'm not on d-devel
--
Leo Costela
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-30
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libcgi-session-perl
Version : 3.93
Upstream Author : Sherzod Ruzmetov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.cpan.org
* License : as Perl itself
Description : Pers
浪潮：国内专业的电子邮件营销网，7600万国内综合电子邮件地址+3200万国内分行业、分服务器、分地区邮件地址+1700万分国家邮件地址+118
种网络营销邮件群发工具（都已经注册）+22.7万大型企业领导人联系地址email地址=160元（原价300），！7600万国内综合电子邮件地址+118种
网络营销邮件群发工具（都已经注册）=80元。全球震撼价，如发现比本站价格更低的，敬请回电，本站将免费赠送上诉资源!
我们的口号：让全球每个人都能聆听到您的讯息!
浪潮网络营销工作室(亿虎系列软件华东代理商）
http://langchao.3322.net
http://langchao.789
James Troup writes:
> Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Btw, looking at the reports, I see 30 submitted from i386 architectures,
> > one from a powerpc machine, none from other architectures, although all
> > architectures are affected. Conclusions? ;-)
>
> Well, duh, let's see. S
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 05:13:13PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote:
> severity #191420 wishlist
> thanks
>
> I don't know why it was filled as Normal... it didn't recognize
> "wishlist" as a valid value for the Severity pseudo-header...
> Any hints?
A temporary BTS glitch. Please ignore it, it's
Neil Roeth wrote:
> On Apr 28, Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > > Many have chroots but don't tend to have the relevant build-deps
> > > installed.
> > You can always send a mail into the direction of
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask for the packages which a
Hamish Moffatt writes:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 04:32:37PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > This is an attempt to summarize some points.
> >
> > 1. Why do we have a problem, other than performance issues?
> >
> > * To maintain binary compatibility with other distributions for C++
> > packages, D
Neil Roeth writes:
> Nice summary.
> > * Drop i386 support mostly. 'i386' architecture becomes 'i486'.
> > Start a 'Debian-real-i386' subproject, with a 'real-i386' architecture,
> > but don't require that any packages build on it in order to go into
> > testing or to release Debian; it would be
On 30 Apr 2003, Leo "Costela" Antunes wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-30
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: gnome-velocity
> Version : 0.1alpha
> Upstream Author : Kyle Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://velocity.sf.net
> *
On Wed, 2003-04-30 at 15:13, Arthur de Jong wrote:
> I think it should be possible for any program that writes to /etc (it it
> cannot use /var) either to be configurable to store it's data somewhere
> else or use a symlink to store the data somwhere else (e.g. /proc/flashrom
> or /nfsmounteddiskbu
Hi,
As writing a network based program, does debian forces i should use standard
structures in headers files? for example:
struct iphdr
i can construct this structure my own. However, does debian want to see there
__standard__
structures in .deb packages?
sincerely.
--halil
Hi,
I'm looking at what needs to be be done for mips support in
debian-installer, and it appears we probably need arcboot support.
Currently the installers prepare the disk image, then present a menu
option to run lilo, or grub (which get run in a chroot of the target).
Would the same work for ar
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 05:44:06AM -0700, Rick Younie wrote:
> I request an adopter for the sbuild package.
Roger Leigh packages buildd (which includes sbuild) locally, so he might
be the right guy for this.
Michael
Other usefulpackage tags would be source language (C, C++, Python, Perl, Ruby
etc.) and platform (KDE, GNOME...).
Jacob Hallén
I can only presume this was SPAM?
Fortunately bug #91791 is already closed and archived.
--
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Begin Message ---
Erase your email record here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A fixed libstdc++ package (0pre7) has been uploaded to incoming. You
> can get it from
>
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/~doko/gcc-3.3/
i've asked in the bug report i filed against the broken libstdc++ and
previously on the debian-gcc mailing list
On Apr 30, Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Neil Roeth wrote:
> > On Apr 28, Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > > > Many have chroots but don't tend to have the relevant build-deps
> > > > installed.
> > > You can always send a mail into t
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 11:53:14PM +0300, Halil Demirezen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As writing a network based program, does debian forces i should use standard
> structures in headers files? for example:
>
> struct iphdr
>
>
> i can construct this structure my own. However, does debian want to see t
On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 10:16:11PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> On Apr 30, Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Neil Roeth wrote:
> > > On Apr 28, Martin Schulze ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > > > > Many have chroots but don't tend to have the relevant bui
Hi,
The way I've always broken into a Linux box when it's been seriously
broken or the root password's been forgotten is to go "linux init=/bin/sh"
at the LILO prompt.
However, this doesn't appear to have the desired effect when you've got a
system that boots with an initrd.
Can anyone enligh
57 matches
Mail list logo
