Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Btw, looking at the reports, I see 30 submitted from i386 architectures, > one from a powerpc machine, none from other architectures, although all > architectures are affected. Conclusions? ;-)
Well, duh, let's see. Several architectures' build were either broken by your libstdc++ i386 vs. i486 changes (arm), unrelated issues (libc-sparc64 for sparc) or simply decided that maybe it was a good idea to not upload such hideously broken packages even if they got a ''successful'' build log? I mean, sheesh, poking fun at underused architectures is all well and good (apparently), but you could at least pick a reasonable example... -- James
