RE: Suspected bug in binutils / ld (using ver 2.22).

2012-05-21 Thread Simon B
My apologies for the lack of clarity. The dot is for punctuation of the e-mail only, it was _not_ part of the command typed. The parameter was completely empty. - Simon. > Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 16:01:14 +0930 > From: amo...@gmail.com > To: sbur...@hotmail.com > CC: bug-binutils@gnu.org > Subjec

Re: Suspected bug in binutils / ld (using ver 2.22).

2012-05-21 Thread Alan Modra
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:27:10AM +0100, Simon B wrote: > > My apologies for the lack of clarity. > The dot is for punctuation of the e-mail only, it was _not_ part of the > command typed. The parameter was completely empty. In that case you configured ld without sysroot support. > > Date: Mon

RE: Suspected bug in binutils / ld (using ver 2.22).

2012-05-21 Thread Simon B
Hi Alan,Really (I know I had it doing it :-) but I made mistake in my copying from one screen to another. The configure is --with-sysroot not --sysroot.Here is the exact command I used to configure it:../binutils-2.22/configure --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --with-sysroot=That is the exact comm

Re: Suspected bug in binutils / ld (using ver 2.22).

2012-05-21 Thread Alan Modra
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 04:00:25PM +0100, Simon B wrote: > Here is the exact command I used to configure it: > ../binutils-2.22/configure --prefix=/usr --enable-shared --with-sysroot= If I configure with exactly those options, using virgin binutils-2.22 sources, I get: $ ld/ld-new --sysroot=/tmp