Changing the label would definitely be an improvement, because at
least then it's understood what it does.
After a few emails with Alexander, I've decided to take the plunge and
see if I can get it to analyze the human input (with a goal of getting
it to analyze both in the final fix) myself. Be warned, as I told
Alexander, I know zero tcl and it could take me a long time.
But it's going to be great fun doing it :)
Dale
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Steven <stevena...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> So only Phalanx' moves are analysed?
>> Forgive me here, but couldn't
>> that be almost considered a bug? I'm much more interested
>> in how good my moves are than the computers... Couldn't we
>> have it ignore Phalanx' moves and only analyse the players? Or
>> if we really want both moves analysed, have separate
>> indicators for white's last move and black's last move?
>
> Hmm... It's not too bad. It's pretty obvious to me when i make
> a blunder. (I get beat).
>
> I'd change this label so it's more obvious about what is happening
>
> --- tcl/lang/english.tcl.orig
> +++ tcl/lang/english.tcl
> @@ -1356,7 +1356,7 @@
> }
>
> #Coach
> -translate E showblunderexists {show blunder exists}
> +translate E showblunderexists {show phalanx blunder}
> translate E showblundervalue {show blunder value}
> translate E showscore {show score}
> translate E coachgame {coach game}
>
>
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
