2009/6/23, Alexander Wagner <a.wag...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de>: > Pascal Georges wrote: > > Hi! > >> Please don't use Scid mailing list for your own project : > > Well, I think we should consider working Stevens changes into Scids main > trunk.
This is not the problem : if you want to, go ahead, and this may be useful sometimes. Personally I will not look at it because code base is different (I will not try to build a patch from one project to another, I have no time to lose doing that). When someone sends me a patch generated from Scid 3.6.1 (and this happened recently !) I don't even look at it (of course). So it is the same with scidvspc. My point is that I do not want confusion between two different projects, so discussions about this fork must go on its own mailing list (and this is what SF offers). If people are interested in scidvspc, they will subscribe to it. I will not. Pascal ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Are you an open source citizen? Join us for the Open Source Bridge conference! Portland, OR, June 17-19. Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250. Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. Register today! http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;215844324;13503038;v?http://opensourcebridge.org _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users
