Alexander Wagner <a.wag...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> writes:

> Marco Pessotto wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
>>> So, whats your build policy here? Do you wnat a 3.6.26
>>> stable with this issue fixed or do you want to go for 3.7?
>>
>> I'll wait for the 3.6.27.
>
> Ok, most likely it will be a 3.7, however.
>

Ups, sorry :-)

>> I've already suggested a solution in a manpage
>> (copying the files in ~/.scid), so you don't have to waste your time in
>> a backport.
>
> Could have been that you need a binary for some Tk8.4 only
> system. This switch is quite a major one between 3.7 and 3.6.26. Thats
> why I'm asking.

I successfully build the cvs version on the latest Slackware 12.2, which
comes with Tk and Tcl 8.5. Scid is a desktop program, and desktop users
often do (or should do) the upgrades. The choice is yours, if you think
this is an issue that needs a backport (the workaround is simple, once
you know what to do). I tried to apply http://tinyurl.com/86qxze to
the 3.6.26 tree, but failed. So, i continue to think this would be a
waste of time ;-)

Thanks again

Marco


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users

Reply via email to