Alexander Wagner <a.wag...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> writes:

>> Could you post a patch? Would be safe applying it to the
>> 3.6.26 release or to the 3.6.27-beta? 
>
> I can backport it to 3.6.26. As code is in CVS already it
> will be in the next beta. I'm not sure it makes much sense
> to create a patch against beta 3.
>
> So, whats your build policy here? Do you wnat a 3.6.26
> stable with this issue fixed or do you want to go for 3.7?

I'll wait for the 3.6.27. I've already suggested a solution in a manpage
(copying the files in ~/.scid), so you don't have to waste your time in
a backport. The next release will be great. Thanks to all for your great
job.

Bests

Marco 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Scid-users mailing list
Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users

Reply via email to