Alexander Wagner <a.wag...@physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> writes: >> Could you post a patch? Would be safe applying it to the >> 3.6.26 release or to the 3.6.27-beta? > > I can backport it to 3.6.26. As code is in CVS already it > will be in the next beta. I'm not sure it makes much sense > to create a patch against beta 3. > > So, whats your build policy here? Do you wnat a 3.6.26 > stable with this issue fixed or do you want to go for 3.7?
I'll wait for the 3.6.27. I've already suggested a solution in a manpage (copying the files in ~/.scid), so you don't have to waste your time in a backport. The next release will be great. Thanks to all for your great job. Bests Marco ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Scid-users mailing list Scid-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scid-users