Update of task #16636 (group administration):
Status: In Progress => Done
Open/Closed: Open => Closed
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #6:
Thank you, approving.
[comment #4 comment #4:]
>> By the way, your documentation is released under the FDL. What is the
>> transparent copy of it?
>
> It is in Texmacs file doc/crystallect.tm
> It is similar to Latex and is quite transparent to read even as a text.
I think that does qualify as a transparent copy.
> Just in case, added a plain copy of FDL license inself at doc/fdl-1.3.1.txt.
I don't think this is actually needed.
[comment #5 comment #5:]
> And I wanted to clarify a thing about non-directly derived works.
>
> If someone is using my tool to develop their own software, I'm not supposed
> to demand it to be placed under the GPL as well. Right?
It depends on whether the resulting software will be a derived work of your
GPL'ed code,
www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#CanIUseGPLToolsForNF
www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#WhatCaseIsOutputGPL
www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLOutput
> In file avl/empty.cry there is this notice:
>
> #This file is in public domain.
> #Don't forget to edit this notice to reflect your copyright and license.
> #It will be transferred as is to C files generated from it.
>
> Is this correct?
The file is very small, so it's probably uncopyrightable. I see nothing
clearly wrong in it.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.nongnu.org/task/?16636>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.nongnu.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
