dmnks left a comment (rpm-software-management/rpm#4293)
> Didn't look in any detail yet, too vacation hazy for that, but just a quick
> comment: adding a whole new directory for these is actually a nice idea -
> that way conflicts are not unlikely, they cannot possibly exist. Not sure
> about the name though, always the tough part 😆
It probably won't come as a surprise, but I pondered about the name quite a
bit, too :laughing:
> Is this supposed to be only for %files manifests? If not, what else?
That's the thing - if it was *only* for the manifests, we could call it
MANIFESTS. But it's also supported by transaction scriptlets, e.g. `%post -f
mypost.sh`.
Funnily enough, when I grepped for this usage in the Fedora spec collection,
there was *zero* specs that make use of that for scriptlets.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/4293#issuecomment-5164598796
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/4293/[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Rpm-maint mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
