On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 07:20, Kevin MacNeil wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:53:36AM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
>  
> > Mozilla has some times a bug or so, and it's probably still not 
> > perfect, but in case of problems with a Mozilla.rpm I'd simply try to 
> > get the original stuff from mozilla.org ... and in case your machine is 
> > faster than the one I was running this browser on ( I have only about 
> > 366 MHz there) then Mozilla probably will be a good browser ...
> 
> Speaking of running on slow machines... I'm using the latest phoenix,
> 0.5.  It's very fast, even on my 433, and I have not had a single
> problem with it.  0.5 is based on a very recent mozilla build, and while
> there's no rpm, it's easy to unpack the binary into a directory under
> /usr/local and run it from there.  It doesn't stick files anywhere else
> on the system, except for the user files at ~/.phoenix.
> 
> I had been happily using mozilla since .7 or so, but I never did use the
> mail, email, or composer programs.  Phoenix has everything I want and
> nothing I don't.

There are also an XFT version of phoenix 0.5 available at 

http://phoenix.ragweed.net/download

Java plugin seems to barf though with unresolved symbols though.  

Does regular phoenix work with Java plugin or is it a problem with the
above link's build?  

They have plenty of warnings on the page so use at own risk and such.

It looks pretty though.  

-- 
Johnathan Bailes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



-- 
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to