On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 07:20, Kevin MacNeil wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 01:53:36AM +0100, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote: > > > Mozilla has some times a bug or so, and it's probably still not > > perfect, but in case of problems with a Mozilla.rpm I'd simply try to > > get the original stuff from mozilla.org ... and in case your machine is > > faster than the one I was running this browser on ( I have only about > > 366 MHz there) then Mozilla probably will be a good browser ... > > Speaking of running on slow machines... I'm using the latest phoenix, > 0.5. It's very fast, even on my 433, and I have not had a single > problem with it. 0.5 is based on a very recent mozilla build, and while > there's no rpm, it's easy to unpack the binary into a directory under > /usr/local and run it from there. It doesn't stick files anywhere else > on the system, except for the user files at ~/.phoenix. > > I had been happily using mozilla since .7 or so, but I never did use the > mail, email, or composer programs. Phoenix has everything I want and > nothing I don't.
There are also an XFT version of phoenix 0.5 available at http://phoenix.ragweed.net/download Java plugin seems to barf though with unresolved symbols though. Does regular phoenix work with Java plugin or is it a problem with the above link's build? They have plenty of warnings on the page so use at own risk and such. It looks pretty though. -- Johnathan Bailes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list