On Tue, 15 Oct 2002 14:46:12 +0800 "Edward Dekkers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There is an article in April 2001 of Linux Journal of a similar > > scenario. As I know little (null) about sendmail, I will just > > refer you to the article. It might shed some more light. > > The named article is, "Providing E-mail Services for a Small > > Office" > > by Stew Benedict. > > > > http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=4539 > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Tom > > Tom, you never cease to help! > > It appears I was doing everything correctly (it was the > genericstable I needed - not the virtusertable just to clarify). > > But there was another option I needed to add to the sendmail.mc > file, which I never knew about. It was listed in the article. The > article was a little away from what I was trying to do, but when my > eye fell on the M4 file, I knew that's what I was looking for. > > FEATURE(`limited_masquerade') > > From what I understand now - the MASQUERADE_AS('domain1') ALWAYS > takes precedence UNLESS you have the FEATURE(`limited_masquerade'). > > THEN basically, whatever is in the genericstable (the users I want > to send with different domains), can take precedence just for those > users. > > I figured that the masquerading section of the article would jog a few "sendmail neurons." ;) Does sendmail then re-masquerade the incoming mail for user@domain2 so the Delivery Agent can get it to the proper mailbox? Or, do you have to write rules for the MDA?.... I'm working on sendmail null +1.1. Best Tom -- redhat-list mailing list unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
