Freshen will only work if they haven't changed the packages around. 
Mozilla-nspr and mozilla-nss didn't exist before.  Do something like this:
[sflory@flory i386]$ rpm -Uvh mozilla-0.9.9-12.7.2.i386.rpm 
mozilla-mail-0.9.9-12.7.2.i386.rpm mozilla-nspr-0.9.9-12.7.2.i386.rpm 
mozilla-psm-0.9.9-12.7.2.i386.rpm


Kent Borg wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 11:29:01AM -0700, Samuel Flory wrote:
> 
>>   You need the mozilla-nspr and mozilla-nss packages.
> 
> 
> Thanks for your reply, it makes sense, but I am still tripping over
> rpm.
> 
> I was doing a "freshen", so if I "install" those two alone:
> 
>   [root@borg rpm]# rpm -ivf i386/mozilla-nspr-0.9.9-12.7.2.i386.rpm 
>i386/mozilla-nss-0.9.9-12.7.2.i386.rpm 
>   error: failed dependencies:
>       mozilla < 0.9.9 conflicts with mozilla-nspr-0.9.9-12.7.2
>   [root@borg rpm]# 
> 
> If I "install" the whole bundle of new RPMs:
> 
>   [root@borg rpm]# rpm -ivh `cat 2002-05-16`
>   error: failed dependencies:
>       mozilla < 0.9.9 conflicts with mozilla-nspr-0.9.9-12.7.2
>   [root@borg rpm]# 
> 
> The "bundle" being today's batch:
> 
>   [root@borg rpm]# cat 2002-05-16
>   ./i386/htdig-3.2.0-2.011302.i386.rpm
>   ./i386/htdig-web-3.2.0-2.011302.i386.rpm
>   ./i386/mozilla-0.9.9-12.7.2.i386.rpm
>   ./i386/mozilla-chat-0.9.9-12.7.2.i386.rpm
>   ./i386/mozilla-devel-0.9.9-12.7.2.i386.rpm
>   ./i386/mozilla-dom-inspector-0.9.9-12.7.2.i386.rpm
>   ./i386/mozilla-js-debugger-0.9.9-12.7.2.i386.rpm
>   ./i386/mozilla-mail-0.9.9-12.7.2.i386.rpm
>   ./i386/mozilla-nspr-0.9.9-12.7.2.i386.rpm
>   ./i386/mozilla-nspr-devel-0.9.9-12.7.2.i386.rpm
>   ./i386/mozilla-nss-0.9.9-12.7.2.i386.rpm
>   ./i386/mozilla-nss-devel-0.9.9-12.7.2.i386.rpm
>   ./i386/mozilla-psm-0.9.9-12.7.2.i386.rpm
>   ./i386/nautilus-1.0.4-47.i386.rpm
>   ./i386/nautilus-devel-1.0.4-47.i386.rpm
>   ./i386/nautilus-mozilla-1.0.4-47.i386.rpm
>   ./i386/galeon-1.2.0-4.i386.rpm
>   ./i386/libmad-0.14.2b-3.i386.rpm
>   ./i386/mpg321-0.2.9-2.5.i386.rpm
> 
> Looks to me like there is a 0.9.9 Mozilla in there.  What am I
> missing?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -kb, the Kent who is trying to be good about staying up to date.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
> 
> 




_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to