So it would be better to go ahead and use Sendmail instead of Postfix? Jim Hale - Jim & Kathy's Website Collection http://hale.dyndns.org
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Wilts > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 10:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Email Services > > > Status: > > > (1) 10 or so Email addresses that I can access via pop3 (Outlook > > XP/2002 INSIDE my firewall) that the outside world can send > mail to. I > > use a dyndns.org address currently and everything is fine there. I > > also need to be able to get to these mailboxes from my workplace. > > Which would be better? Sendmail, Postfix or what? > > Sendmail is actually fairly trivial for the basics. It has a > lot of options, but it's unlikely you'll need to tweak the > vast majority of them. Most Linux distributions include an > imap/pop3 server that's perfectly adequate. Sendmail had a > lot of security issues in its history but it's currently > considered secure - after all, there are a *LOT* of major > companies that rely on Sendmail and if there were to be a > hole, it would be fixed very quickly. > > > (2) The ability to setup Mailing Lists that people can subscribe to > > either by sending an email to my daemon or by a web page interface. > > Red Hat Linux comes with Mailman - it's what drives this > list. I've got a few small lists my server and haven't had > any issues. Red Hat wouldn't use it if it sucked. I've > always used the web interface - I can't remember if it's got > mail-message commands. > > Ed Wilts > Mounds View, MN, USA > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/re> dhat-list > > _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
