-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ed Wilts wrote:
>All this leads me back to my original comments - there is lots of work going >on, and I'm sure we'll have good ACL support eventually, but today it's not >there for most of us. You might get something work that works for you, but >you'll be bleeding edge, probably run into incompabilities, and who knows what >else. For the record, I was thinking specifically of Solaris when I mentioned Unix filesystem ACLs. It's disappointing that there's not yet a mature open source alternative, but hey, Rome wasn't built in a day ... - -d - -- David Talkington PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/0xCA4C11AD.pgp -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 6.5.8 Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iQA/AwUBPJpsW79BpdPKTBGtEQIc9wCfav6NrIFe+8iXrMRVvFeBSXbmky8AoKO/ htiW0J5CxU/v35RomjMB9g8h =eyjo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
