The mindcraft "study" was bought and paid for by Microsoft, and has been widely shown to be fraudulent and invalid. MANY, many articles have been written about the multitude of ways in which they skewed the results to favor MS. In addition, there were some valid criticisms of Linux in the report, ALL of which have been fixed since that time with current releases of Linux. In short, linux far surpasses NT in file server performance given equal circumstances.
-Scott Lewi wrote: > > I have a job to replace Netware to linux as linux server on my division, > > well, when I'm trying to search information in internet, I found that linux with >samba is slower than NT > try a look at: > http://www.mindcraft.com/whitepapers/openbench1.html > I know that the result maybe can't be compared today > does anyone know anything about this, and what do u think? > > it is right to choose combination between linux and samba? any suggestion? > and maybe u can give me an url about information that related to my problem? > > thank you > > -- > ichtus > ------ > Lewi Supranata .K > ICQ: 50643061 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
