A follow-up on this issue...- kernel-headers was posted along with kernel-2.2.19-6.2.16. - The sparc64 packages for 2.2.19-6.2.16 were released today (March 21st). Much apreciated. Thank you RedHat. I'm closing the bugzilla incident. ,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-, Vincent S. Cojot, Computer Engineering. STEP project. _.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~ Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal, Comite Micro-Informatique. _.,-*~'`^`'~*-,. Linux Xview/OpenLook resources page _.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~' http://step.polymtl.ca/~coyote _.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._ [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 13 Mar 2002, Vincent Cojot wrote: > > Did anyone notice the 2.2.19-6.2.15 updates from RedHat? > > There is no kernel-headers-2.2.19-6.2.15 package for any arch. > There are no kernel-*2.2.19-6.2.15*rpm for sparc64 although there -are- > kernel-*2.2.19-6.2.15*rpm packages for "sparc". > > The .spec rebuilds them just fine, though.. Of course, that makes GPG sigs > fail.. > > This surprises me as RedHat had gotten 2.2.19-6.2.12 right. It saddens me > to see that 2.2.19-6.2.15 isn't OK since I have 100+ servers across Europe > with 6.2 alone (both i386 and sparc). Even with "current" or RHN, > forgetting a Package just isn't making our lives easier. > > RedHat: Please upload the rest of the packages, you missed some on the way > out to the ftp site. Thank you. _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
