Vincent Cojot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 13 Mar 2002, Trond Eivind [iso-8859-1] Glomsrød wrote: > > Trond, > > Thanks for sharing the light about where it's headed > (glibc-kernheaders). It was pretty clear that the headers hadn't changed > (I, for once, actually inspect the .spec file and the patches to the > kernel-2.2 kernel for RH6.2 since I must rebuild them for sparc64 > everytime RedHat releases a new version - I'm adding some things we need ) > I was only discussing the missing package and wanted to report that to the > RedHat people since I consider this to be a "packaging regression".
The only reason for releasing the package is to avoid confusion with people who think they need a new one. They don't. The old ones are just as good... > Is there a specific place (bugzilla, list, whatever,..) where to > report packaging problems? Like the fact that the sendmail-cf dir moved > silently from /usr/share to /usr/lib between 8.11.6-x and > sendmail-8.11.6-1.6.y, that the naming scheme isn't consistent for > different versions of the same package for different versions of Redhat > [67].x ? Is there a place where to report these things? Bugzilla would be it. -- Trond Eivind Glomsrød Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
