-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 20 January 2002 03:35 pm, Enrique Bory Simon wrote:
> Before all , let thanks to Devon again by problems with "rpm".
>
> Do you  have tried amavisd???
> I m trying with rh 7.1 s + sendmail8.11.2 + amavisd-snapshot-20010714
> AND all README that I found ........,,, but there  is something wrong:

I haven't used amavisd at all.

> 0) I did configure --enable-relay --enable-sendmail; make ; make
> install and added new mailer amavis and rule set 0 in sendmail.cf, in
> other words, I did all that the README.sendmail says.

Changes to sendmail.cf are best done by editing /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and 
using m4 to regenerate sendmail.cf. Details are at the top of the 
sendmail.mc file.

[snip]

> So, I sent a mail with the  FROM: = [EMAIL PROTECTED] and TO: =
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> and this log look like that !!!

Did the mail go through? Is server1.scu.tel.etecsa.cu your machine?

(By the way, scu.tel.etecsa.cu is on at least one open relay blackhole 
list. See:    http://orbz.org/b.php?216.72.24.82 for details.)

> Jan 20 11:17:21 server1 sendmail[13288]: g0KGHLr13288:
> from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=1399, class=0, nrcpts=1,
> msgid=<001f01c1a1e7$bc2d7ea0$8e0da8c0@bory>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA,
> relay=server4.scu.tel.etecsa.cu [192.168.13.23]
> Jan 20 11:17:22 server1 sendmail[13290]: g0KGHLr13288:
> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01,
> mailer=amavis, pri=31399, dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent

> I think that all was Ok! , agree?

Looks ok to me.

> Jan 20 11:37:01 server1 amavisd[13193]: enter accept loop
> Jan 20 11:37:01 server1 amavisd[24256]: forked off -- child running...
> Jan 20 11:37:01 server1 amavisd[24256]: /var/amavis/amavis-XXhVxoOm:
> from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED],U=amavis:amavis>
> Jan 20 11:37:02 server1 amavisd[24256]: Extracting mime components
> Jan 20 11:37:03 server1 amavisd[24256]: Level: 1
> Jan 20 11:37:03 server1 amavisd[24256]: File-type of msg-24256-1.txt:
> ASCII text
> Jan 20 11:37:03 server1 amavisd[24256]: File-type of msg-24256-2.html:
> HTML document text
> Jan 20 11:37:05 server1 amavisd[24256]: Scanning
> /var/amavis/amavis-XXhVxoOm/parts/*
> Scanning file /var/amavis/amavis-XXhVxoOm/parts/msg-24256-1.txt
> Scanning file /var/amavis/amavis-XXhVxoOm/parts/msg-24256-2.html
>
> Summary report on /var/amavis/amavis-XXhVxoOm/parts/*
> File(s)
>         Total files: ...........       2
>         Clean: .................       2
>         Possibly Infected: .....       0
>
> Jan 20 11:37:05 server1 amavisd[24256]: do_exit:439 - ending execution
> with 0

> I don't know WHY amavisd added ".handle.local.hacks" to address
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ??? What it mean ????

Could be something amavis does internally when processing mail messages, 
I'm not sure.

> What 's mean the last line "Jan 20 11:37:05 server1 amavisd[24256]:
> do_exit:439 - ending execution with 0" ?? just this "do_exit:439"
> I'm looking in any where something like that error, but any clue of
> this !!!!!!!

Again, I don't know that it is an error. Could just be amavis announcing 
that the message was processed and sent.

I think the important thing is knowing if the message was delivered.

Did sendmail work before adding the amavis software?

If you are trying to send mail to your own machine, have you changed the 
defaults in sendmail.mc as detailed in the README file included on the 
distribution cds? By default, sendmail will not accept mail, except from 
localhost.

> PD> I apologise for my bad english, i live in cuba and i speak spanish

My Spanish is a lot worse than your English. ;)

Hope that helps,

- -D

- -- 

pgp key:  http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/pgpkey.txt

- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8S4bUeMAUbzJhSVcRAuriAKCfokVWhfLhiGxTj4ifa/t1vtQRDwCcD8q1
hlMn6wANDzKOq5/Q51yYM8U=
=mR/S
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to