On Sat, 12 Jan 2002 15:31:46 -0600 Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Monte, > I have found your comparison excellent, as I have just come from SuSE, > and have been there quite awhile, though various upgrades. I have found > several RPMs built for RH to work quite nicely in SuSE without any > problems. >
I've found some do, some don't. IIRC, since they (RH rpms) don't put things in exactly the same place a SuSE RPM would, the apps don't show up on the menus in KDE, etc. > One of the biggest differences that I see, is the absolutely astounding > documentation supplied by SuSE, as they include several books with the > distros, covering just about everything, They even have a manual for > networking. I must admit, I am getting addicted to the RHN though. <g> > Yes. SuSE is the master when it comes to useful documentation included w/ the boxed set. If Red Hat were to adopt *one* thing from SuSE, it should be to take a hard look at the SuSE manuals and online help system and implement something similar or better. > I find RH somewhat "smoother" for a lack of a better term, and gives me > faster disk I/O. > Hmmm... I have by and large had the opposite experience. SuSE is smoother for me, so long as you stick w/ the stuff from the disks. Red Hat may be a bit easier to deal w/ when it comes to getting stuff off the Web and putting it on your system. Well, from one SuSE'er to another, Have a lot of fun! Monte _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
