On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 19:55:00 +0100
"Go, Jeffrey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi guys
> 
> 
> What would be the major differences between RH 7.2 and SUSE Linux?
> 

The two distributions have somewhat different layouts as far as some of
the system files, which means that about half the time, RPMs from one
won't work on the other.

SuSE has a fairly well-developed, but proprietary, system admin took
called yast.  The original yast1 is a terminal program, i.e. it has menus,
but is called from a command line and works the same from an xterm as it
does from a console w/ no X.  The newer yast2 has a text mode and a GUI
mode (qt/kde).  Somewhat more asthetically appealing, but currently much
slower.  These tools are at the core of any system administration on a
SuSE system, and the values modified w/ them are stored in a large file,
/etc/rc.config, although a few others are utilized as well for specialized
setting such as firewalls.  RedHat has not real centralized tool on this
scale (think /sbin/setup to a power of 3), and stores the settings
scattered around the /etc/sysconfig directory, among other places.  The
yast1/2 tools also provide an interface to LVM setup and admin.  SuSE
provides a couple of firewall tools, and has been for at least a year
before Red Hat.  There is the personal_firewall, which is basically for a
dialup/cablemodem user offering no services to anyone, and then there is
SuSEFirewall 1 & 2, for ipchains and iptables, respectively.  Also there
are several included security scripts for checking things like the /tmp
directory, etc.  Not essential, but a nice touch.

SuSE comes w/ more software initially; 6 CDs/ 1 DVD, and the yast tools
are w/o peer in the rpm world for managing these vendor supplied packages.
 They fall down when you start adding in other packages from other
sources.  Which brings us to one of the big weak spots of SuSE:  lack of
software on the internet.  What I mean by this, is if you go to about any
opensource project, if there are binaries availabe, there will likely be
RPMs among them.  RPMs built w/ a RH system in mind, not a SuSE box. 
Pretty much your only choice at that point is to download the source, and
eithe just compile it and hope it doesn't have problems w/ the rest of
your system, or build an RPM of it and install it.  Otherwise, you are
largely limited to whatever version of package foo comes on the install
media.

Both vendors have online update programs: Red Hat has the Red Hat Network
(RHN), and SuSE has Yast Online Update (YOU).  Red Hat's is free for one
machine, even those built w/ a non boxed version i.e. burn CD of RH,
though there are ways around it for those of us w/ a home network.  YOU is
only available w/ SuSE, which is not available for free for i386, period. 
But once you have a legit copy, you can install it on any number of
machines, and each one can fully use YOU w/o need for hokey workarounds. 
Six of one, half a dozen of another.

Both companies heavily subsidize the Open Source community in the way of
kernel developers and other programmers.  Red Hat backs the GNOME project
and several kernel developers (Alan Cox, IIRC); SuSE backs KDE and kernel
developers like Andrea Archangeli (sp?), and Hans Reiser of ReiserFS fame.
 Red Hat has a somewhat better 'history' of open-sourcing their
install/admin tools, whereas SuSE maintains a deathgrip on their
install/admin tool yast, to the point of not putting forth a GPL version
of SuSE for places like CheapBytes to distribute, since it would
supposedly threaten their business model as yast1/2 are proprietary.  Red
Hat isn't completely innocent about the free CD thing lately, but for
different reasons.

SuSE over all seems a little more polished, and, well, coherent as a total
package.  There is a string, though.  Deviation from the 'SuSE way' can be
quite painful, as their tools and methods permeate the distro extensively.
Red Hat is a little more of a 'generic' distro; more of a jack of all
trades, master of none.  I'd venture to guess that SuSE has moderately
better hardware detection/support, and could possible be a bit better
choice as a new users' desktop system (almost as friendly as Mandrake, but
not as flaky).

Just my $.02 worth, after using both distros for several years now, since 
5.0 of RH and 5.3 of SuSE.

HTH,

Monte

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to