I sure would like to see the official $30-$40 versions come back. Did someone do some marketing and see that raising the prices would increase profits? I mean, obviously he was right, cause profits are up. > ---------- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 7:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Cheapbytes > > rpjday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On 18 Dec 2001, Dominic Mitchell wrote: > > > > > I agree, you can't pay 7.99$ fro the unofficial cd's and expect RH > > > to provide any services. They already provided the service of > > > putting out the distribution ... > > > > > > However, offering services for a fee for those that did not buy > > > the official cd's should bring some more revenues. It is up to RH > > > to decide what is the proper price for those services. Anyway > > > they won't prevent the redistribution of their ftp version Linux. > > > Thus might might as well grab the opportunity for more revenues. > > > > and as has already been suggested elsewhere, red hat made an > > obvious mistake in discontinuing a $29 basic boxed set. now > > those who would have been happy to support red hat in paying > > for an official boxed set are undoubtedly thinking hard about > > shelling out $59(?), or just a couple of bucks to cheapbytes. > > It's less that it used to for the same product (the Deluxe > version for $89 or whatever it was). Also, if you've already decided > you want to get Red Hat Linux in the store, chances are you'll get the > edition there. At least that's what I hope :) > -- > Trond Eivind Glomsr> ød > Red Hat, Inc. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Redhat-list mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list >
_______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
