This has always been RedHat's position; RH Linux can be freely
redistributed but cannot be called RedHat. Nothing new, just a reiteration
of what has always been true.
- rick
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Monte Milanuk wrote:
>
> http://www.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=01/12/10/2014239
>
> Anyone else came across this? Kind of an odd time to come
> up w/ this, I'd think. Any idea what brought this on, and what they are
> really trying to stop? I kind of got the impression that they are
> trying to prevent people from buying $5 CD sets and
> expecting RH to support them, but it kind of comes across
> as though they are embarking on a witch hunt to choke off
> the flood of places marketing RH cds entirely. I choose to
> use KRUD, and periodically buy a RH boxed set just to
> support RH, but I don't like the idea of tummy.com getting
> hassled over KRUD just because of the name. I asked the people at KRUD,
> and they at least don't feel like they'd be affected by it.
>
> Opinions, comments?
>
> Monte
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Redhat-list mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
