On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Mike Burger wrote: > Did you, at any point, do an "iptables save"? yes i did. I missed somthing on flushing the rules. I only flushed the chains and missed the tables (nat, filter). > If so, you'll need to edit /etc/sysconfig/iptables, and comment out or > remove the dnat rules, there.Then, run "service iptables restart", which > will cause iptables to reload the saved configuration. > > Works well for me. > > On Fri, 7 Dec 2001, Redhat mailing list wrote: > _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Re: IMAP secure or insecure? cgalpin
- Re: IMAP secure or insecure? Jason Costomiris
- Re: IMAP secure or insecure? Dan Egli
- Re: IMAP secure or insecure? Jason Costomiris
- Re: IMAP secure or insecure? Dan Egli
- RE: IMAP secure or insecure? Tong Young
- Iptables and masquerading Anth Courtney
- Re: Iptables and masquerading Jason Costomiris
- Probably bug in Iptables, I think Redhat mailing list
- Re: Probably bug in Iptables, I think Mike Burger
- Re: IMAP secure or insecure? Redhat mailing list
- Re: IMAP secure or insecure? Dan Egli
- Re: IMAP secure or insecure? Jason Costomiris
- Re: IMAP secure or insecure? Dan Egli
- FTP Server under Firewall Redhat mailing list
- Sendmail Question Redhat mailing list
- Re: [RH List] Sendmail Question Ashley M. Kirchner
- Re: [RH List] Sendmail Question Redhat mailing list