-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 14 Nov 2001, Patrick Nelson wrote: >I'm just not sure what is the best way to name systems on the private >side of our LAN. We tried using just single names but some programs >seem to have problems with it. Like NIS and SendMail. What is the best >way to name systems on a LAN behind a firewall that don't have internet >names?
I use "localdomain", eg: linuxbox.localdomain. Tony - -- Anthony E. Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.pobox.com/~agreene/> OpenPGP Key: 0x6C94239D/7B3D BD7D 7D91 1B44 BA26 C484 A42A 60DD 6C94 239D Chat: AOL/Yahoo: TonyG05 Linux. The choice of a GNU Generation. <http://www.linux.org/> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Anthony E. Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 0x6C94329D iD8DBQE783FSpCpg3WyUI50RAmkcAKDGfsnMxdnSvBvXHwPUqEqaRhry7wCg3mwq jEeOCQAR8J4LSXOR06Vdf9A= =IClQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
