> >Nope...but I really do suggest NCFTPd...
>
> I concur. I chose it because we needed to provide ftp service to the
> public, and I simply don't have time for the buffer overflows and
> other nonsense in the other popular servers. It's straightforward to
> configure and has a great reputation.
It has had problems in the past, though. There is a new ftp server
implementation that was designed from the ground-up with the express
purpose of being secure. The reputation of Chris Evans also serves to
convince me that it's secure.
If you'd like more information about it, there's an article and pointer to
further information on linuxsecurity.com:
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/articles/security_sources_article-2390.html
Additionally, it's included in the EnGarde Secure Linux distribution, and
is preconfigured. Information on configurating it manually can be found
at:
http://www.linuxsecurity.com/articles/vendors_products_article-2876.html
If you're interested in ESL, check out the site at:
http://www.engardelinux.org
Regards,
Dave
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
