I'm afraid that I can't agree with you, here.

I've been running Red Hat distributions on my servers for the last 5
years.

The bugs that have appeared in the programs distributed in Red Hat's
packages have appeared in the same packages distributed in every
other distribution, Mandrake, Slackware, SuSe, etc.

If you're willing to keep up with the updates, which, from Red Hat or
any other Linux distributor, are packaged far more frequently and
quickly than for any Microsoft product, you're fine.

As for getting Red Hat Linux running on your hardware, I'd submit to
you that first, you should double check the Red Hat hardware
compatibility list, to make sure your hardware is listed as
compatible.  If it turns out that your hardware is not compatible,
then you really have nobody but yourself to blame for the inability
to run the system.  And if your hardware is listed as compatible,
then as for help, rather than simply blasting the company who,
primarily, packages this Linux distribution...they don't write all
the packages contained therein.

On Sun, 08 Apr 2001 02:24:01 -0500, Aage J. Skjolingstad wrote:

>Dear Silviu,
>
>Thank you - my complete problem is that yes, - I need a rest - special
>from clappers like you - 
>
>Wake up and be more selective - may be you will find out that there is a
>lot of "providers" here that's not much better than M$.
>
>Good Morning,
>
>Aage
>
>Silviu Cojocaru wrote:
>> 
>> On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, at 01:36 (GMT -0500), Aage J. Skjolingstad wrote:
>> 
>> > I'm impressed ??
>> >
>> > About what - RedHat - no; - Mr. Young - I will get many against me
>> > tonight.
>> 
>> You seem to be your own enemy, you don't need more.
>> 
>> > How can somebody so similar to Bill Gates - (well he is missing some of
>> > the money) - selling for high "copy cost" so much BS that's not working;
>> > worst - he is not even prepared to do anything about it ???
>> >
>> > You buy any RH and it is full of something that's not working; --it's a
>> > sh..t ???
>> >
>> > RedHat has to wake up or it will not be around for much more time - as
>> > what I have experienced is more "service patches" that I had to upgrade
>> > from my NT during the whole time I were using it.
>> 
>> Hahaha, and you think your NT moves better than RH, LMAO, get your eyes
>> fixed pal. Btw, those patches fixed ALL known security issues that regard
>> the distro, NT and generally speaking Windoze still hasn't any fixes for
>> known issues (see the multiple file extension matter).
>> 
>> > Quo Vadis - Linux - but this is not the way to promote yourself - RH is
>> > launching a lot of stuff that is not readdy or is not working correct at
>> > all. Go fore the enterprises - this is not for the small guy.
>> 
>> Did you try using some other distro ? I don't think they release a samller
>> volume of fixes than RH.
>> 
>> > Should we continue to support something like this  ???
>> 
>> Yeah.
>> 
>> > I believe that the penguin was meant for something much different - The
>> > big ones get going being Microsoft or being RedHat - and we have to
>> > accept all ??
>> 
>> Oh, you poor strined little man, get a vacation, get some rest.
>> 
>> > I have had more problems to get the RH 7.0 working correct that I had
>> > with all MS programs during the last 5 years --- we need something
>> > better ???? Blue screen or RedHat core dumps does not make any
>> > difference to me.
>> 
>> Hmmm I've been using RH on my system from version 6.0 (2 years ago) and
>> I'm happily using 7.0 now, maybe you should go back to NT, seems that
>> clever setups are not for you... Core dumps, never had one, except xmms
>> on exiting but that was promptly fixed  with a glibc update ions ago.
>> 
>> Alas, go away, you bother me.
>> 
>> --
>> 
>>     If Bill Gates had a dime for every time a Windows box crashed...
>>                      ..., Oh wait, he already does.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Redhat-list mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Redhat-list mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
>





_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to