On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Michael Burger wrote:
> Not necessarily.
>
> Default route is one thing...but if both NICs are on teh same
> network, there is no specific route to the 192.168.0.0 network. Both
> interfaces know about the 192.168.0.0 network, by default.
>
That is why I answered the way I did. It depends on the routing table.
On all of my systems, there is a network route, and it has a specific
interface that that route uses. I think this is the default setup in
RedHat. So the second interface would not be used for any address that
is not specificly routed through that interface.
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 18:45:16 -0600 (CST), Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>
> >On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Michael Burger wrote:
> >
> >> You could disconnect the cable from eth0.
> >>
> >> Your machine will only have one default route...and since it's
> >> usually going to be defaulted to the IP on eth0, unless there is no
> >> connection there.
> >>
> >This will probably not work. It depends on the routing tables. If the
> >default route and the 192.168.0.0 network route use eth0, then you will
> >get a host unreachable message.
> >
> >Mikkel
> >--
> >
> > Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
> > for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
