-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Bret Hughes wrote:
>"Tanner, Robby" wrote:
>> I am looking for feedback on the various versions of SSH.
>> Specifically, I would like a comparison of the commercial vs free version(s)
>> wrt functionality, security, stability and ease of configuration/deployment.
> I see
>zero reasons to consider a commercial option.
While I agree with Bret's choice, be cautious about scp. It's still
buggy in OpenSSH under some circumstances. If it works well for you,
that's great, but certain combinations of OS and server seem to have a
voodoo component. Works sometimes, doesn't work others. Test it
under all anticipated client/server combinations before you commit, if
you have other users to consider. I actually run both distributions,
one of them on a nonstandard port, to cover my butt in rare instances
of difficulty.
OpenSSH is by far easier to configure (the SSH Communcations package
has the feel of a series of afterthoughts), and sports much cleaner
integration of protocols 1 and 2.
- -d
- --
David Talkington
Prairienet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
217-244-1962
PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk/dt000823.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6
iQEVAwUBOn+UAr1ZYOtSwT+tAQGKZQf7BgnVSQqOX6OamrSK+rJfgSGrgi9g4qZx
/mIZfrwOozrpkCAepJy4ndbpcjpbgkBZ0qCaL+fOvof2pdew3fZ50VoFV87O68ev
Wg1zkrqEZO3DxvHoa+1BGRW81FFPl/a2hAhXKdAV1wOQcZdLWH7dUpTbdY52WvPj
REDqW0kOMFk/bpgqN1jCPg9T5OUsqvApUF2N3TfuA7w+vYT+SXHf4/CuHHOnBiyq
ixiB7sHL5QnbZ74C6ubu21RAXnCktImTClBFLdT1clFkFiNF4/+fHzG04cO7X8BC
1DVYw8n2JyALBoDzGS4Pk7EMHCXGYp/frA0XW2rD/zMeRLqoS4zNiw==
=J1Mb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
