On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Gill, Vern wrote:

> Sam Flory wrote:
> I am not using initrd. I should not have to use it. 

You have to, if the IDE driver is not directly compiled into the
the kernel.  But I digress.

> The laptop does not.

I suspect that if you check /etc/conf.modules on your laptop and
compare it with the /etc/conf.modules file on your desktop (or
whatever) you will that they are different with regard to IDE
module configurations.

> 2.4.0 worked beautifully on it without the ide in the kernel. It is a
> module there, and there are no problems with it. The lilo.conf entry for
> it uses the exact same root= as the default RH kernel installed
> initially. I do NOT want the ide in the kernel. It should not have to be
> there. There is some other problem, I just don't know what.

Okay, I see where you are coming from now.  Again, you have to
have either the IDE driver directly into the kernel or be loading
the IDE driver from a ramdisk first as I suspect is the case with
your laptop.  So to prepare the ram disk you need to use the
'mkinitrd' utility which reads module info from
/etc/conf.modules.  Which means you have to have the IDE module
configured in /etc/conf.modules (at least temporarily) before
running 'mkinitrd' on your desktop.

HTH,
LG
-- Generated Signature --
Sorry.  Nice try.
-- End Sig --



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to