Larry,

Maybe so. But shouldn't the line

#if [ -f /poweroff -o ! -f /halt ]; then

actually read

#if [ -f /sbin/poweroff -o ! -f /sbin/halt ]; then

anyway?

Regards
Gustav


Larry Grover wrote:
> 
> In RH6.2, typing "halt" at the command line would bring the system down and then do 
>a power-off.  In RH7.0, "halt" simply brings the system down without a power-off.  
>Under 7.0 you can do a halt+power-off by typing "poweroff" at the command line.  On 
>my 7..0 machine, "halt -p" has the same result as "poweroff".
> 
> This change in behavior was apparently intentional (from 
>http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18885):
> 
> "------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2000-10-14 06:23 -------
> 
> The behaviour has changed intentionally. The 'poweroff' command does a shutdown
> and power off,
> the halt command now just halts the machine. This matches the behaviour of other
> platforms."
> 
> So this is a feature, not a bug.
> 
> If you like the old behavior better, you can always change the `halt` script in 
>/etc/rc/d/init.d.  Of course, the next time you update your initscript package, your 
>changes will get overwritten, so save a backup copy under a different name.
> 
> Since typing "halt -p" isn't much more effort than typing "halt", I changed the 
>`halt` script back to match the script as originally installed by 7.0.
> 
> I have no idea how this change in behavior would affect someone who boots into 
>graphic mode (run level 5).
> 
> __
> Larry Grover, PhD
> Assoc Prof of Physiology
> Marshall Univ Sch of Med

-- 
pgp = Pretty Good Privacy.

To get my public pgp key, send an e-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Visit my web site at http://www.schaffter.com



_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list

Reply via email to