Chad,
I definitively think so. I followed the links to bugzilla that Larry
provided in a different msg. But from what I could see in their
responses, they didn't think it was a problem, but more of a feature.
(??) (I could of course have misunderstood their point. I'm known to do
that sometimes.)
Maybe sending them the solution might give them the light?
I don't want to do this myself, since I don't have RH7 yet. I'm still on
RH6.2+ on all my machines and the /etc/rc.d/init.d/halt script doesn't
look the same in RH6.x. As a result, I couldn't verify a fix or try
something they would propose, if that would become the case. So I must
let someone already running RH7 do the bugzilla stuff this time.
Maybe you should talk to Larry and decide which one of you would do a
bugzilla report?
Regards
Gustav
P.S. My solution, as shown below, was very much a guesswork. I just
thought the line looked strange and I couldn't believe that they had put
either poweroff or halt in root.
"Chad W. Skinner" wrote:
>
> > Larry,
> >
> > I believe that line should probably be corrected to read:
> >
> > #if [ -f /sbin/poweroff -o ! -f /sbin/halt ]; then
> >
> > to make it work as intended. (Haven't tried it myself, though. I'm still
> > on RH6.2+)
>
> I made these changes and it worked for the first time with X running. Is
> this something that redhat should be made aware of as it seems as thought it
> would affect everyone with the paths being wrong?
>
> Chad
--
pgp = Pretty Good Privacy.
To get my public pgp key, send an e-mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit my web site at http://www.schaffter.com
_______________________________________________
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
