On Mon 25 Sep at 16:33:07 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] done said: > "2.4 kernel ready" does not mean it shipped with the 2.4 kernel. Likely just > means they've tested everything using a recent 2.4 beta release. > I can't see Redhat releasing a beta kernel in a commercial product. Way too > many dollars on the line to take such a risk. Why not? They've done it before -- IIRC shipping a kernel they've called 2.2.14 with 6.2beta before it had received Linus's blessing. _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- Re: RH 7.0 Robert Fausey
- Re: RH 7.0 Vidiot
- Re: RH 7.0 Charles Galpin
- Re: RH 7.0 Eddie Strohmier
- Re: RH 7.0 Vidiot
- Re: RH 7.0 John Aldrich
- Re: RH 7.0 Kevin Wood
- RE: RH 7.0 John MacLean
- Re: RH 7.0 Eddie Strohmier
- RE: RH 7.0 Thornton Prime
- Re: RH 7.0 cb
- Re: RH 7.0 Uncle Meat
- Re: RH 7.0 cb
- RH 7.0 and SWAP partition Tonko de Rooy
- Re: RH 7.0 and SWAP partition Grant Nygren
- Re: RH 7.0 and SWAP partition Tonko de Rooy
- Re: RH 7.0 and SWAP partition Charles Galpin
- Re: RH 7.0 and SWAP partition Tonko de Rooy
- Re: RH 7.0 and SWAP partition Vidiot
- Re: RH 7.0 and SWAP partition Rick Warner
- Re: RH 7.0 and SWAP partition Tonko de Rooy