Why the major number change, then? Why not call it RedHat 6.3? Calling it RedHat 7.0 seems to lead one to believe that there's a change significant enough to warrant the major number progression. What is that change, then? XFree86 v4 ? Lee Howard At 07:28 PM 8/14/00 -0400, you wrote: >It won't be 2.4.0, that's for sure.. it'll prolly be 2.2.16 since that's >what's been out for a while now. > _______________________________________________ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat-list
- rh 7.0 official release.. Rob Smith
- Re: rh 7.0 official release.. Chuck Mead
- Re: rh 7.0 official release.. rpjday
- Re: rh 7.0 official release.. kabir
- Re: rh 7.0 official release.. Statux
- Re: rh 7.0 official release.. Lee Howard
- Re: rh 7.0 official relea... rpjday
- Re: rh 7.0 official r... Gordon Messmer
- Re: rh 7.0 official r... rpjday
- Re[2]: rh 7.0 officia... Yuri Kay
- Re: rh 7.0 official r... Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: rh 7.0 official r... Lee Howard
- Re: rh 7.0 official r... Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- Re: rh 7.0 official r... Lee Howard
- Re: rh 7.0 official r... Isaiah Weiner
- Re: rh 7.0 official relea... Jason Costomiris