At 09:32 AM 7/14/00 , you wrote: >Looks good, I have used similar for monitoring remote, network connected >systems but, and I quote; > >"The first thing you'll need is two computers. You need not have identical >hardware in both machines (or amount of memory, etc.), but if you did, it >would make your life that much easier when a component fails." Well, I agree with your points but not your conclusion... I would advocate buying old stripped 486 (or even 386) computers and running a floppy-disk-Linux like LRP with heartbeat as a simpler, more flexible, and probably cheaper (albeit bulkier) solution. http://www.linuxrouter.org -Alan -- To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject.
- Re: Hardware Watchdogs / Alternatives Alan Mead
- Re: Hardware Watchdogs / Alternatives Dan Kronstadt
- Re: Hardware Watchdogs / Alternatives Bret Hughes
- Re: Hardware Watchdogs / Alternatives Fred Whipple
- Re: Hardware Watchdogs / Alternatives tcurl
- Re: Hardware Watchdogs / Alternatives Alan Mead
- Re: Hardware Watchdogs / Alternatives Mikkel L. Ellertson
- Re: Hardware Watchdogs / Alternatives Fred Whipple
- Re: Hardware Watchdogs / Alternatives Nitebirdz
- Re: Hardware Watchdogs / Alternatives tcurl
- Re: Hardware Watchdogs / Alternatives Alan Mead
- Re: Hardware Watchdogs / Alternatives Janyce Wynter
- RH 6.2 pthreads problem -- H E L P fred smith
- Re: RH 6.2 pthreads problem -- H E L P Charles Galpin
- Re: RH 6.2 pthreads problem -- H E L P fred smith
- Re: Hardware Watchdogs / Alternatives tcurl