ok, do you know why this happened with my computer? my unix box here at
work works fine, but thats a RISC processor. I don't have to do anything
to that, it just works. It has 1 gig of ram and it recognizes all of it.
jake
On Tue, 9 May 2000, George F. Schoelles wrote:
> On Tue, 09 May 2000, you wrote:
> > On Tue, 9 May 2000, George F. Schoelles wrote:
> >
> > > You should only need this parameter if your Bios does not properly
report
> > > attached memory.
> >
> >
> > This is not always the case, I have RH Linux 6.1 running on a brandnew
> > Fica SD11 with an athalon 850 (it screams!) with 320 megs of ram. I
had to
> > put the append in for 300 megs of ram because linux was only using 64
megs
> > of ram. And it wouldn't boot linux if I put in 320, hence why I put in
> > 300. That was the highest I could go without the machine locking up.
> >
> > Jake
> >
> >
>
> I still stand by my statement.
>
Jake McHenry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
