I have the same feeling ... before installing it !
I actually have bought the CD .. It is sitting there and I am not very exited about
installing it : I will get old enlightemnent , old gnome , my little beloved
ipchains , ppp scripts will be smashed etc ...
BTW, I followed the little war about gome and enlightenment versions. I have been
running E 0.16 for 4 months. Very cute, doesn't eat up that much at all. Very stable.
I don't want to go back to 0.15 . Same for gnome. And what about the kernel : I have
been running my customized 2.2.14 for 2 months already ...
Maybe this is why I am not that excited . Yes, I would go backwards and god knows what
the install/rpm will do with my little customized things. Well, I know I will have to
do it at some point.
Just have the plan this move very well, so I won't loose more than I gain. Redhat
smashing thing is easy to get
Philippe
David Yates <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I agree with you about 6.2 appearing quite stable. I guess it's the
> desktops, (enlightenment and kde both are not uptodate, orcomplete)
> and applications that seem cut back from previous versions. It just seems
> like all I got was 6.1 with fixes. I had that before I
> went to 6.2., I actually had more.
> Sort of hard to explain.... I you read my original post, I was really just
> curious about others' opinions of 6.2.
>
> ---
> David S. Yates' Lotta Linux Links
> http://dsyates.home.mindspring.com
>
> >>> Lars Kellogg-Stedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/14 8:16 AM >>>
> > Does anybody here wish they had not upgraded from 6.1 to 6.2?
> > I have been using redhat since 4.0, and this is the first new version that
> I
> > have been unhappy with.
> > It sort of seems like a downgrade for me.
>
> I felt the same way about 6.1.
>
> You've made a very vague statement here, without any supporting evidence,
> so it's somewhat difficult to determine why you feel this way.
>
> 6.2 -- which I am running on both Sparc and Intel systems -- has thus far
> appeared to be quite stable. I found that the installer, in particular,
> has been much improved over the bug-prone one used with 6.1.
>
> What particular problems have you seen?
>
> -- Lars
>
> --
> Lars Kellogg-Stedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --> http://www.larsshack.org/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
> as the Subject.
--
To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe"
as the Subject.
